US Military Intervention in Panama vs. US Military Intervention in Venezuela
What's the Difference?
US Military Intervention in Panama and US Military Intervention in Venezuela both involved the United States deploying military forces to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation. In Panama, the US military intervened in 1989 to overthrow dictator Manuel Noriega and restore democracy, while in Venezuela, there have been ongoing tensions and threats of military intervention due to the political crisis and human rights abuses under President Nicolas Maduro. Both interventions have been controversial and have raised questions about the US's role in promoting democracy and stability in Latin America.
Comparison
| Attribute | US Military Intervention in Panama | US Military Intervention in Venezuela |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 1989 | Not applicable |
| Reason for intervention | Removal of Manuel Noriega | Not applicable |
| Duration | Operation Just Cause lasted a few weeks | Not applicable |
| International reaction | Mixed reactions from other countries | Controversial with some countries condemning it |
Further Detail
Background
US military intervention in Panama took place in 1989 under the codename Operation Just Cause. The intervention was aimed at removing Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega from power and restoring democracy in the country. The operation involved over 27,000 US troops and was largely successful in achieving its objectives. On the other hand, US military intervention in Venezuela has not yet occurred, but there have been ongoing discussions and tensions between the two countries. The US has imposed sanctions on Venezuela in response to the political and humanitarian crisis in the country.
Objectives
In Panama, the main objective of US military intervention was to remove Manuel Noriega from power and restore democracy. The intervention was also aimed at protecting US citizens living in Panama and safeguarding US interests in the region. In Venezuela, potential US military intervention would likely be aimed at addressing the political and humanitarian crisis in the country. The US has expressed concerns about the authoritarian regime of Nicolas Maduro and the deteriorating living conditions of the Venezuelan people.
International Support
US military intervention in Panama had the support of several Latin American countries, including Colombia, Costa Rica, and Honduras. The intervention was also backed by the Organization of American States. In contrast, potential US military intervention in Venezuela has faced opposition from several countries, including Russia, China, and Cuba. These countries have expressed support for the Maduro regime and have criticized US interventionist policies.
Humanitarian Impact
US military intervention in Panama had a relatively low humanitarian impact, with fewer than 300 civilian casualties reported during the operation. The intervention was largely focused on removing Noriega from power and restoring democracy, rather than causing widespread destruction. In contrast, potential US military intervention in Venezuela could have a much higher humanitarian impact, given the ongoing crisis in the country. The intervention could exacerbate existing food and medicine shortages and lead to further displacement of civilians.
Regional Stability
US military intervention in Panama had a positive impact on regional stability, as it removed a dictator who was involved in drug trafficking and human rights abuses. The intervention helped to restore democracy in Panama and improve relations with neighboring countries. In contrast, potential US military intervention in Venezuela could have a destabilizing effect on the region. The intervention could lead to increased tensions with countries like Russia and China, and could potentially spark a larger conflict in Latin America.
Long-Term Consequences
US military intervention in Panama had long-term consequences for the country, including the establishment of a democratic government and improved relations with the US. The intervention also led to the extradition of Manuel Noriega to the US, where he was tried and convicted on drug trafficking charges. In contrast, potential US military intervention in Venezuela could have uncertain long-term consequences. The intervention could lead to a power vacuum in the country and further instability, or it could pave the way for a transition to a more democratic government.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.