Torturer Gets Child Who Enjoys Being Spanked to Talk by Showing Them Bare Butts of Others After Their Spanking While Denying Child Spanking vs. Torturer Gets Child Who Enjoys Being Spanked to Talk by Telling About the Spankings of Others While Denying Spanking

Attribute	Torturer Gets Child Who Enjoys Being Spanked to Talk by Showing Them Bare Butts of Others After Their Spanking While Denying Child Spanking	Torturer Gets Child Who Enjoys Being Spanked to Talk by Telling About the Spankings of Others While Denying Spanking
Method of getting child to talk	Showing bare butts of others after spanking	Telling about the spankings of others
Denial of child spanking	Denies child spanking	Denies child spanking
Focus on others' spankings	Focus on others' spankings	Focus on others' spankings

Introduction

When it comes to extracting information from a child who enjoys being spanked, there are two common methods that torturers may employ. One method involves showing the child the bare butts of others after their spanking while denying the child any spanking themselves. The other method involves telling the child about the spankings of others while denying any spanking to the child. In this article, we will compare the attributes of these two methods and discuss their effectiveness in getting the child to talk.

Showing Bare Butts of Others Method

The first method involves showing the child the bare butts of others after their spanking. This can be a highly effective technique as it plays on the child's fear of embarrassment and humiliation. By witnessing the consequences of disobedience, the child may be more inclined to talk in order to avoid a similar fate. However, this method can also be seen as a form of psychological torture, as it may traumatize the child and cause long-term emotional damage.

Furthermore, by denying the child any spanking themselves, the torturer may be missing out on a potential source of leverage. If the child enjoys being spanked, withholding this punishment may not be as effective in getting them to talk. Additionally, the child may see through the bluff and realize that they are not in any real danger of being spanked themselves.

• Effective in instilling fear
• Potential for emotional trauma
• Misses out on potential leverage
• Child may see through bluff

Telling About Spankings of Others Method

The second method involves telling the child about the spankings of others while denying any spanking to the child. This method relies on the child's empathy and guilt to get them to talk. By hearing about the pain and suffering of others, the child may feel compelled to confess in order to alleviate their own guilt. However, this method may not be as effective if the child does not have a strong sense of empathy or if they do not believe that the stories are true.

Additionally, by denying any spanking to the child, the torturer may be missing out on a potential source of motivation. If the child enjoys being spanked, the threat of this punishment may be more effective in getting them to talk. Without this leverage, the child may not feel as pressured to reveal the information that the torturer is seeking.

• Relies on empathy and guilt
• May not be effective for all children
• Misses out on potential motivation
• Child may not feel pressured to talk

Conclusion

In conclusion, both methods of getting a child who enjoys being spanked to talk have their own strengths and weaknesses. The method of showing the child the bare butts of others after their spanking can be effective in instilling fear, but it may also cause emotional trauma and miss out on potential leverage. On the other hand, the method of telling the child about the spankings of others relies on empathy and guilt, but it may not be effective for all children and may miss out on potential motivation. Ultimately, the effectiveness of each method will depend on the individual child and their unique psychological makeup.