Torturer Fails to Spank Confession out of Child Who Enjoys Being Spanked vs. Torturer Spanks Confession out of Child Who Hates Being Spanked

Attribute	Torturer Fails to Spank Confession out of Child Who Enjoys Being Spanked	Torturer Spanks Confession out of Child Who Hates Being Spanked
Effectiveness of torture	Not effective	Effective
Mental state of the child	Enjoys being spanked	Hates being spanked
Level of resistance	Low resistance	High resistance
Emotional impact on the child	Less emotional impact	High emotional impact

Introduction

When it comes to extracting confessions from individuals, torture has been a method used throughout history. However, the effectiveness of torture can vary depending on the individual being interrogated. In this article, we will compare the attributes of a torturer who fails to spank a confession out of a child who enjoys being spanked versus a torturer who successfully spanks a confession out of a child who hates being spanked.

Child Who Enjoys Being Spanked

When dealing with a child who enjoys being spanked, the torturer may face challenges in using spanking as a method of extracting a confession. The child's enjoyment of the act may lead to resistance and defiance, making it difficult for the torturer to break their will. The child may even see the spanking as a form of reward rather than punishment, further complicating the interrogation process.

Additionally, the torturer may struggle to find alternative methods of torture that are effective in eliciting a confession from a child who enjoys being spanked. Without the ability to use physical pain as a deterrent, the torturer may need to explore psychological tactics or other forms of coercion to achieve their goal. This can prolong the interrogation process and potentially lead to a lack of success in obtaining the desired confession.

Overall, the torturer's inability to use spanking as a means of breaking the child's will can result in a failed interrogation and a lack of valuable information being obtained. The child's enjoyment of being spanked creates a barrier to the torturer's efforts, making it challenging to achieve their objectives.

Child Who Hates Being Spanked

On the other hand, when dealing with a child who hates being spanked, the torturer may have an easier time using spanking as a method of extracting a confession. The child's aversion to the act may make them more susceptible to the physical pain and discomfort caused by the spanking, increasing the likelihood of them breaking under pressure.

The torturer can use the child's fear and dislike of being spanked to their advantage, using it as a tool to coerce the child into confessing. The threat of further punishment through spanking can be a powerful motivator for the child to reveal information, as they will do whatever it takes to avoid experiencing the pain again.

Furthermore, the torturer may find it easier to break the child's will and extract a confession through spanking, as the physical pain can wear down their resistance over time. The child's hatred of being spanked can be exploited by the torturer to achieve their objectives more quickly and effectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the attributes of a torturer who fails to spank a confession out of a child who enjoys being spanked differ significantly from a torturer who successfully spanks a confession out of a child who hates being spanked. The enjoyment or aversion to spanking can play a crucial role in the effectiveness of torture as a method of interrogation. Understanding these differences is essential for torturers seeking to extract confessions from individuals and achieve their objectives.