Theodore Roosevelt New Nationalism 1910 vs. Woodrow Wilson The New Freedom 1913

Attribute	Theodore Roosevelt New Nationalism 1910	Woodrow Wilson The New Freedom 1913
Definition	Believed in a strong federal government to regulate big business and protect the welfare of the people	Advocated for small government and free competition, with a focus on breaking up monopolies
Economic Policy	Supported progressive income tax, inheritance tax, and regulation of corporations	Advocated for antitrust laws and breaking up monopolies to promote competition
Social Policy	Emphasized social justice and government intervention to address social issues	Believed in individual freedom and limited government interference in social matters
Foreign Policy	Advocated for a strong military and international involvement to protect American interests	Emphasized diplomacy and peaceful resolution of conflicts

Theodore Roosevelt's New Nationalism

Theodore Roosevelt's New Nationalism was a progressive political platform that he introduced in a speech in 1910. Roosevelt believed in a strong federal government that would regulate big business and protect the rights of workers and consumers. He argued for a more active role for the government in promoting social justice and ensuring a fair distribution of wealth. Roosevelt's New Nationalism called for the regulation of monopolies, the protection of natural resources, and the establishment of a minimum wage and maximum working hours.

Woodrow Wilson's The New Freedom

Woodrow Wilson's The New Freedom was a progressive political platform that he outlined during his presidential campaign in 1912. Wilson believed in breaking up monopolies and restoring competition in the marketplace. He argued for a smaller federal government that would empower small businesses and individuals. Wilson's New Freedom called for the elimination of tariffs that protected big business, the creation of a federal income tax to redistribute wealth, and the establishment of a Federal Reserve System to regulate the banking industry.

Government Role

Roosevelt's New Nationalism advocated for a strong federal government that would actively intervene in the economy to promote social justice and regulate big business. He believed that the government had a responsibility to protect the rights of workers and consumers and ensure a fair distribution of wealth. In contrast, Wilson's The New Freedom called for a smaller federal government that would break up monopolies and restore competition in the marketplace. Wilson believed that empowering small businesses and individuals would lead to a more equitable society.

Economic Policies

Roosevelt's New Nationalism focused on regulating monopolies, protecting natural resources, and establishing labor reforms such as a minimum wage and maximum working hours. He believed that government intervention was necessary to prevent the abuses of big business and ensure a level playing field for all. On the other hand, Wilson's The New Freedom aimed to break up monopolies and eliminate tariffs that protected big business. Wilson believed that competition was essential for a healthy economy and that government should not interfere with the free market.

Social Justice

Roosevelt's New Nationalism emphasized the importance of social justice and the government's role in promoting equality and fairness. He believed that the government should protect the rights of workers and consumers and ensure that wealth was distributed more equitably. In contrast, Wilson's The New Freedom focused on empowering individuals and small businesses to compete in the marketplace. Wilson believed that a more competitive economy would lead to greater opportunities for all and a more just society.

Conclusion

While both Theodore Roosevelt's New Nationalism and Woodrow Wilson's The New Freedom were progressive political platforms that aimed to address the social and economic challenges of their time, they differed in their views on the role of government and the best approach to promoting social justice and economic fairness. Roosevelt advocated for a strong federal government that would regulate big business and protect the rights of workers and consumers, while Wilson called for a smaller government that would empower individuals and small businesses to compete in a free market. Ultimately, both platforms sought to create a more just and equitable society, but they had different ideas about how to achieve that goal.