vs.

T-72 vs. T-80

What's the Difference?

The T-72 and T-80 are both Soviet-era main battle tanks that have seen extensive use in various conflicts around the world. The T-72 is known for its simplicity and ease of maintenance, making it a popular choice for many countries with limited resources. On the other hand, the T-80 is a more advanced and technologically sophisticated tank, featuring a more powerful engine and improved armor protection. While the T-72 is more widely used due to its affordability and availability, the T-80 is considered to be a more capable and formidable tank on the battlefield. Ultimately, the choice between the two tanks depends on the specific needs and capabilities of the military using them.

Comparison

AttributeT-72T-80
OriginRussiaRussia
ManufacturerUralvagonzavodKharkiv Morozov Machine Building Design Bureau
Weight41.5 tonnes46 tonnes
Main Armament125mm smoothbore gun125mm smoothbore gun
EngineV-84-1 diesel engine6TD-1 diesel engine
Speed60 km/h70 km/h

Further Detail

Introduction

The T-72 and T-80 are two of the most iconic tanks in the Russian military arsenal. Both tanks have been in service for several decades and have seen action in various conflicts around the world. In this article, we will compare the attributes of the T-72 and T-80 tanks to determine their strengths and weaknesses.

Armor

One of the most important aspects of any tank is its armor protection. The T-72 features composite armor made of steel, ceramics, and Kevlar, providing good protection against small arms fire and shell fragments. The T-80, on the other hand, has improved armor protection with the addition of explosive reactive armor (ERA) tiles, which can detonate upon impact to neutralize incoming projectiles. This gives the T-80 an edge in terms of survivability on the battlefield.

Firepower

When it comes to firepower, both the T-72 and T-80 are equipped with a 125mm smoothbore gun as their main armament. However, the T-80 has a more advanced fire control system and can fire anti-tank guided missiles in addition to conventional rounds. This gives the T-80 a greater range and accuracy compared to the T-72. Additionally, the T-80 can fire depleted uranium rounds, which are more effective against armored targets.

Mobility

Both the T-72 and T-80 are powered by gas turbine engines, which provide good power-to-weight ratios and high speeds on the battlefield. However, the T-80 has a more powerful engine and can achieve higher speeds compared to the T-72. The T-80 also has a hydropneumatic suspension system, which allows for better maneuverability over rough terrain. This gives the T-80 an advantage in terms of mobility and agility on the battlefield.

Technology

When it comes to technology, the T-80 is more advanced than the T-72. The T-80 features a computerized fire control system, thermal imaging sights, and a laser rangefinder, which provide the crew with enhanced situational awareness and targeting capabilities. The T-80 also has a more sophisticated communications system, allowing for better coordination with other units on the battlefield. In contrast, the T-72 has a more basic fire control system and lacks some of the advanced features found on the T-80.

Cost

One of the key factors to consider when comparing the T-72 and T-80 is the cost. The T-72 is a more cost-effective option compared to the T-80, making it a popular choice for countries with limited defense budgets. The T-80, on the other hand, is more expensive to produce and maintain due to its advanced technology and features. This can be a limiting factor for some countries looking to acquire new tanks for their military forces.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the T-72 and T-80 tanks have their own strengths and weaknesses. The T-72 is a reliable and cost-effective option with good armor protection and firepower. On the other hand, the T-80 is a more advanced and capable tank with superior armor, firepower, mobility, and technology. Ultimately, the choice between the T-72 and T-80 will depend on the specific requirements and budget constraints of the military force in question.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.