Survivor Follower vs. Yes Person

Attribute	Survivor Follower	Yes Person
Independence	May have some independence and critical thinking skills	Often lacks independence and blindly agrees with others
Resilience	Can adapt to challenges and setbacks	May struggle to cope with adversity
Leadership	Can take on leadership roles when necessary	Usually prefers to follow rather than lead
Decision-making	Capable of making decisions based on own judgment	Tends to agree with decisions made by others

Introduction

Survivor Followers and Yes Persons are two types of individuals who often find themselves in leadership positions or working closely with leaders. While both may seem similar on the surface, there are distinct differences in their attributes and behaviors that can have a significant impact on their effectiveness in a team or organization.

Survivor Follower Attributes

Survivor Followers are individuals who are adept at navigating challenging situations and adapting to change. They are resilient, resourceful, and able to thrive in high-pressure environments. These individuals are often seen as valuable team members due to their ability to problem-solve and think on their feet. Survivor Followers are not afraid to take risks and are willing to step up and take charge when necessary.

• Resilient
• Resourceful
• Adaptable
• Problem-solvers
• Risk-takers

Yes Person Attributes

Yes Persons, on the other hand, are individuals who are eager to please and often prioritize harmony and agreement over critical thinking and independent decision-making. They are known for their willingness to say "yes" to any request or idea, regardless of its merit or feasibility. Yes Persons may struggle with setting boundaries and asserting themselves, leading to a lack of authenticity and autonomy in their interactions with others.

• Eager to please
• Harmony-seeking
• Agreeable
• Boundary-challenged
• Lack of autonomy

Impact on Leadership

Survivor Followers can be valuable assets to leaders, as they are able to provide support and guidance in times of crisis or uncertainty. Their ability to think critically and take initiative can help drive innovation and problem-solving within a team or organization. In contrast, Yes Persons may inadvertently enable poor decision-making by leaders, as their tendency to agree without question can lead to a lack of diverse perspectives and critical feedback.

Collaboration and Team Dynamics

Survivor Followers are often seen as collaborators who are willing to challenge the status quo and push for improvement within a team. Their resilience and adaptability can help foster a culture of growth and innovation. Yes Persons, on the other hand, may struggle to contribute meaningfully to team dynamics, as their eagerness to please can hinder open communication and constructive conflict resolution.

Personal Development and Growth

Survivor Followers are constantly seeking opportunities for personal and professional growth, as they are motivated by challenges and new experiences. They are not afraid to take risks and step outside of their comfort zones in order to learn and develop. Yes Persons, on the other hand, may struggle with personal development, as their tendency to prioritize harmony and agreement over personal growth can limit their ability to learn and evolve.

Conclusion

While Survivor Followers and Yes Persons may both have their strengths and weaknesses, it is clear that Survivor Followers are better equipped to thrive in leadership roles and contribute meaningfully to team dynamics. Their resilience, resourcefulness, and willingness to take risks make them valuable assets in any organization. Yes Persons, on the other hand, may benefit from developing their assertiveness and critical thinking skills in order to become more effective collaborators and leaders.