Saylor Model vs. Taba

Attribute	Saylor Model	Taba
Approach to curriculum development	Structured and sequential	Problem-solving and inquiry-based
Focus on student needs	Emphasizes individualized instruction	Considers group dynamics and social context
Role of teacher	Facilitator and guide	Facilitator and collaborator
Assessment methods	Varied assessments including quizzes and exams	Authentic assessments like projects and presentations

Introduction

When it comes to educational models, the Saylor Model and Taba are two popular approaches that have been used in classrooms around the world. Both models have their own unique attributes and strengths that make them effective in different teaching and learning environments. In this article, we will compare the key attributes of the Saylor Model and Taba to help educators understand the differences between the two and determine which model may be best suited for their needs.

Philosophy

The Saylor Model is based on the principles of behaviorism, which focuses on observable behaviors and the use of reinforcement to shape and modify behavior. This model emphasizes the importance of clear objectives, structured lessons, and frequent assessments to ensure that students are meeting learning goals. In contrast, the Taba model is rooted in constructivism, which emphasizes the active role of the learner in constructing knowledge through hands-on experiences and collaboration with peers. This model values student-centered learning and encourages critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Curriculum Design

In terms of curriculum design, the Saylor Model follows a more traditional approach with a predetermined curriculum that is divided into units or modules. Each unit typically includes learning objectives, instructional materials, and assessments to measure student progress. In contrast, the Taba model takes a more flexible approach to curriculum design, allowing for student input and interests to shape the direction of learning. This model often involves the use of thematic units that integrate multiple subject areas and encourage interdisciplinary connections.

Instructional Strategies

When it comes to instructional strategies, the Saylor Model often relies on direct instruction, teacher-led activities, and drill-and-practice exercises to help students master content. This model places a strong emphasis on teacher control and guidance to ensure that students stay on track and meet learning objectives. On the other hand, the Taba model encourages more student-centered instructional strategies, such as project-based learning, cooperative group work, and inquiry-based activities. This model values student autonomy and independence in the learning process.

Assessment Methods

Assessment methods in the Saylor Model typically include traditional measures such as quizzes, tests, and exams to evaluate student learning and mastery of content. These assessments are often used to provide feedback to students and guide instruction. In contrast, the Taba model emphasizes alternative assessment methods, such as portfolios, presentations, and performance tasks, that allow students to demonstrate their understanding in a more authentic and meaningful way. This model values ongoing assessment and feedback to support student growth and development.

Classroom Environment

The classroom environment in the Saylor Model is often structured and teacher-centered, with a focus on maintaining order and discipline to facilitate learning. Teachers in this model are seen as the primary source of knowledge and authority in the classroom. In contrast, the Taba model promotes a more student-centered and collaborative classroom environment, where students are actively engaged in the learning process and encouraged to take ownership of their education. Teachers in this model serve as facilitators and guides, rather than the sole source of information.

Conclusion

While both the Saylor Model and Taba have their own unique attributes and strengths, it is important for educators to consider the specific needs and goals of their students when choosing a teaching model. The Saylor Model may be more suitable for classrooms that require a structured and teacher-led approach to instruction, while the Taba model may be better suited for classrooms that value student-centered learning and collaboration. By understanding the key differences between these two models, educators can make informed decisions about which approach will best support student learning and achievement.