Samsung Galaxy S II (Galaxy S2) Model GT-I9100 vs. ViewSonic ViewPad 4

Attribute	Samsung Galaxy S II (Galaxy S2) Model GT-I9100	ViewSonic ViewPad 4
Operating System	Android	Android
Display Size	4.3 inches	4.1 inches
Resolution	480 x 800 pixels	480 x 800 pixels
Processor	Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9	Single-core 1 GHz
RAM	1 GB	512 MB
Internal Storage	16/32 GB	2 GB
Camera	8 MP (primary), 2 MP (secondary)	5 MP (primary), 0.3 MP (secondary)
Battery Capacity	1650 mAh	1930 mAh
Weight	116 grams	168 grams

Design and Display

The Samsung Galaxy S II (Galaxy S2) Model GT-I9100 and the ViewSonic ViewPad 4 differ significantly in terms of design and display. The Galaxy S2 features a sleek and slim design with a 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus display. The display offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent viewing angles. On the other hand, the ViewPad 4 has a more compact design with a 4.1-inch TFT LCD display. While the ViewPad 4's display is decent, it falls short in terms of color reproduction and viewing angles compared to the Galaxy S2.

Performance and Hardware

When it comes to performance and hardware, the Galaxy S2 takes the lead. It is powered by a dual-core 1.2 GHz Exynos processor and 1GB of RAM, providing smooth multitasking and snappy performance. The ViewPad 4, on the other hand, is equipped with a single-core 1GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor and 512MB of RAM, which may result in slower performance and limited multitasking capabilities.

In terms of storage, the Galaxy S2 offers 16GB or 32GB internal storage options, expandable via a microSD card slot. The ViewPad 4, on the other hand, only provides 2GB of internal storage, but it does have a microSD card slot for expansion.

Both devices support 3G connectivity, allowing users to browse the internet, stream videos, and download apps. However, the Galaxy S2 also offers 4G LTE connectivity in some variants, providing faster download and upload speeds compared to the ViewPad 4.

Camera Capabilities

When it comes to camera capabilities, the Galaxy S2 outshines the ViewPad 4. The Galaxy S2 features an 8-megapixel rear camera with autofocus and LED flash, capable of capturing high-quality photos and recording Full HD videos. It also has a 2-megapixel front-facing camera for video calls and selfies. In contrast, the ViewPad 4 has a 5-megapixel rear camera and a VGA front-facing camera, which may not deliver the same level of image quality as the Galaxy S2.

Operating System and Software

The Galaxy S2 originally launched with Android 2.3 Gingerbread but is upgradable to Android 4.1 Jelly Bean. It also features Samsung's TouchWiz user interface, which provides additional customization options and features. The ViewPad 4, on the other hand, runs on Android 2.3 Gingerbread and does not have any custom user interface. While both devices may feel slightly outdated in terms of software, the Galaxy S2 has the advantage of being upgradable to a newer Android version.

Battery Life

In terms of battery life, the Galaxy S2 and the ViewPad 4 offer different experiences. The Galaxy S2 is equipped with a 1650mAh removable battery, which provides a decent amount of usage time. However, due to its powerful hardware, the battery may drain faster during heavy usage. The ViewPad 4, on the other hand, has a larger 1800mAh non-removable battery, which may offer slightly longer battery life compared to the Galaxy S2.

Additional Features

Both devices come with a range of additional features. The Galaxy S2 includes NFC (Near Field Communication) support, allowing users to make contactless payments and easily share files with other NFC-enabled devices. It also features a built-in FM radio and support for DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) for wireless media streaming. The ViewPad 4, on the other hand, lacks NFC support and FM radio but does offer HDMI output, allowing users to connect their device to a larger display.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy S II (Galaxy S2) Model GT-I9100 and the ViewSonic ViewPad 4 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Galaxy S2 excels in terms of design, display, performance, camera capabilities, and additional features. It offers a superior user experience with its powerful hardware and upgradable software. On the other hand, the ViewPad 4 may appeal to users looking for a more compact device with a slightly longer battery life and HDMI output for display connectivity. Ultimately, the choice between the two devices depends on individual preferences and priorities.