Run Dev vs. SST Dev

What's the Difference?

Run Dev and SST Dev are both software development methodologies that focus on continuous integration and deployment. However, Run Dev places a stronger emphasis on automation and rapid iteration, while SST Dev prioritizes stability and reliability. Run Dev is often used in fast-paced environments where frequent updates are necessary, while SST Dev is more commonly employed in industries where system downtime is not acceptable. Both methodologies have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them ultimately depends on the specific needs and goals of the development team.


AttributeRun DevSST Dev
DefinitionDevelopment process where changes are made directly on the live serverDevelopment process where changes are made on a separate server before being deployed to live server
RiskHigher risk of errors and downtimeLower risk of errors and downtime
TestingTesting is done on live serverTesting is done on separate server
DeploymentChanges are deployed directly to live serverChanges are deployed after testing on separate server

Further Detail


When it comes to software development methodologies, two popular approaches are Run Dev and SST Dev. Both methodologies have their own unique attributes and advantages. In this article, we will compare the key features of Run Dev and SST Dev to help you understand which one may be more suitable for your project.

Development Process

Run Dev follows an iterative and incremental approach to software development. It focuses on delivering working software in short iterations, allowing for continuous feedback and improvement. On the other hand, SST Dev is a more structured and sequential methodology that follows a predefined set of steps from planning to deployment. While Run Dev is more flexible and adaptable to changes, SST Dev provides a clear roadmap for the development process.

Team Collaboration

In Run Dev, collaboration and communication among team members are highly emphasized. The team works closely together to solve problems, share knowledge, and make decisions collectively. SST Dev, on the other hand, may have a more hierarchical structure with defined roles and responsibilities for each team member. While Run Dev promotes a more collaborative and dynamic team environment, SST Dev ensures clear accountability and efficiency in task execution.

Customer Involvement

Customer involvement is a key aspect of both Run Dev and SST Dev methodologies. In Run Dev, customers are actively engaged throughout the development process, providing feedback and prioritizing features based on their needs. SST Dev also values customer input but may involve them more at specific stages, such as requirements gathering and user acceptance testing. Both methodologies aim to deliver software that meets customer expectations and requirements.

Flexibility and Adaptability

One of the main advantages of Run Dev is its flexibility and adaptability to changes. The iterative nature of the methodology allows for quick adjustments based on feedback and evolving requirements. SST Dev, on the other hand, may be less flexible due to its structured and sequential approach. While SST Dev provides a clear plan and timeline for development, it may be challenging to accommodate changes once the process is set in motion.

Risk Management

Both Run Dev and SST Dev methodologies address risk management in different ways. Run Dev focuses on identifying and mitigating risks early in the development process through continuous testing and feedback. SST Dev, on the other hand, may have a more formal risk management process that involves risk assessment, mitigation strategies, and contingency planning. While Run Dev may be more proactive in addressing risks, SST Dev provides a systematic approach to risk management.

Quality Assurance

Ensuring software quality is a priority for both Run Dev and SST Dev methodologies. Run Dev emphasizes continuous testing and quality assurance practices throughout the development cycle to detect and fix defects early. SST Dev, on the other hand, may have a more structured quality assurance process that includes formal reviews, inspections, and testing phases. While Run Dev promotes a more dynamic and proactive approach to quality assurance, SST Dev ensures a systematic and thorough evaluation of software quality.


In conclusion, both Run Dev and SST Dev have their own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to software development. Run Dev offers flexibility, collaboration, and customer involvement, making it suitable for projects with evolving requirements and a dynamic team environment. SST Dev, on the other hand, provides structure, accountability, and risk management, making it ideal for projects with well-defined requirements and a more hierarchical team structure. Ultimately, the choice between Run Dev and SST Dev will depend on the specific needs and constraints of your project.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.