RTL8852AE vs. RTL8852CE
What's the Difference?
The RTL8852AE and RTL8852CE are both high-performance Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) chips developed by Realtek. They both offer advanced features such as MU-MIMO, OFDMA, and 1024-QAM modulation for improved efficiency and speed in wireless communication. However, the RTL8852CE is designed for use in client devices such as laptops, tablets, and smartphones, while the RTL8852AE is intended for use in access points and routers. Additionally, the RTL8852CE supports Bluetooth 5.2 connectivity, while the RTL8852AE does not. Overall, both chips offer cutting-edge technology for fast and reliable wireless connectivity, tailored to different types of devices.
Comparison
Attribute | RTL8852AE | RTL8852CE |
---|---|---|
Wireless Standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
Max Speed | 3.6 Gbps | 3.6 Gbps |
Frequency Bands | 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz | 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz |
Antenna Configuration | 2x2 | 2x2 |
Bluetooth Version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Further Detail
Introduction
When it comes to choosing the right wireless chipset for your device, it's important to consider the various attributes and features that different models offer. In this article, we will compare the RTL8852AE and RTL8852CE chipsets from Realtek, two popular options in the market. By examining their specifications, performance, and compatibility, we can determine which chipset may be the best fit for your needs.
Specifications
Both the RTL8852AE and RTL8852CE chipsets are designed for Wi-Fi 6E connectivity, offering support for the latest wireless standards. The RTL8852AE features a 2x2 MU-MIMO configuration, providing faster speeds and improved performance in crowded network environments. On the other hand, the RTL8852CE comes with a 1x1 MU-MIMO setup, which may be sufficient for smaller networks or devices with lower bandwidth requirements.
Performance
When it comes to performance, the RTL8852AE chipset has the upper hand with its 160 MHz channel bandwidth support, allowing for faster data transfer rates and reduced latency. This makes it ideal for high-demand applications such as online gaming or 4K video streaming. In comparison, the RTL8852CE chipset supports a maximum channel bandwidth of 80 MHz, which may result in slightly slower speeds and higher latency in certain scenarios.
Compatibility
Both chipsets are compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making them versatile options for various devices. The RTL8852AE chipset, however, offers additional support for Bluetooth 5.2 connectivity, allowing for seamless integration with Bluetooth-enabled devices such as headphones or keyboards. On the other hand, the RTL8852CE chipset lacks Bluetooth support, which may be a drawback for users who require this feature.
Power Consumption
One important factor to consider when choosing a wireless chipset is power consumption. The RTL8852AE chipset is designed to be energy-efficient, with advanced power-saving features that help extend battery life in portable devices. In contrast, the RTL8852CE chipset may consume slightly more power due to its lower MIMO configuration and lack of Bluetooth support. This could be a consideration for users looking to maximize battery performance in their devices.
Price
Price is often a significant factor when choosing a wireless chipset, especially for budget-conscious consumers. The RTL8852AE chipset tends to be priced slightly higher than the RTL8852CE, reflecting its superior performance and additional features such as Bluetooth support. While the RTL8852CE may be a more cost-effective option for users with basic connectivity needs, the RTL8852AE offers better value for those who require higher speeds and advanced features.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the RTL8852AE and RTL8852CE chipsets have their own strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different use cases. The RTL8852AE excels in performance and features, making it a great choice for users who demand high-speed connectivity and advanced capabilities. On the other hand, the RTL8852CE offers a more budget-friendly option for users with simpler connectivity requirements. Ultimately, the best chipset for you will depend on your specific needs and budget constraints.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.