Practical Implications for Teachers in Bobbitt Approach vs. Practical Implications for Teachers in Stenhouse Approach

Attribute	Practical Implications for Teachers in Bobbitt Approach	Practical Implications for Teachers in Stenhouse Approach
Curriculum Development	Focus on predetermined objectives and content	Focus on student interests and needs
Teacher Role	Deliver content and assess student learning	Facilitate student inquiry and exploration
Student Role	Passive recipients of knowledge	Active participants in their learning
Evaluation	Assessment based on predetermined criteria	Assessment based on student growth and understanding

Introduction

When it comes to educational approaches, teachers often find themselves navigating through various theories and methodologies to enhance their teaching practices. Two prominent approaches in education are the Bobbitt Approach and the Stenhouse Approach. Both approaches offer practical implications for teachers, but they differ in their underlying principles and strategies. In this article, we will compare the practical implications for teachers in the Bobbitt Approach and the Stenhouse Approach.

Practical Implications for Teachers in Bobbitt Approach

The Bobbitt Approach, developed by Franklin Bobbitt in the early 20th century, is based on the idea that education should be focused on achieving specific objectives or outcomes. In this approach, teachers are expected to follow a predetermined curriculum that outlines the content and skills students need to learn. Practical implications for teachers in the Bobbitt Approach include:

• Following a structured curriculum that outlines specific learning objectives
• Designing lessons and assessments that align with the predetermined objectives
• Using standardized tests to measure student achievement of the objectives
• Providing direct instruction to ensure students meet the desired outcomes
• Adhering to a strict timeline to cover all the required content

Practical Implications for Teachers in Stenhouse Approach

The Stenhouse Approach, proposed by Lawrence Stenhouse in the mid-20th century, emphasizes a more student-centered and experiential approach to education. In this approach, teachers are encouraged to focus on the process of learning rather than just the outcomes. Practical implications for teachers in the Stenhouse Approach include:

• Designing curriculum collaboratively with students to incorporate their interests and experiences
• Encouraging inquiry-based learning and critical thinking skills
• Providing opportunities for students to explore and discover knowledge on their own
• Using formative assessments to gauge student progress and adjust instruction accordingly
• Allowing flexibility in pacing and content to accommodate student needs and interests

Comparison of Practical Implications

While both the Bobbitt Approach and the Stenhouse Approach offer practical implications for teachers, they differ in their focus and strategies. The Bobbitt Approach emphasizes a more traditional and structured approach to education, with a focus on predetermined objectives and outcomes. Teachers in this approach are expected to follow a set curriculum and provide direct instruction to ensure students meet the desired outcomes.

On the other hand, the Stenhouse Approach promotes a more student-centered and experiential approach to education, with a focus on the process of learning rather than just the outcomes. Teachers in this approach are encouraged to collaborate with students in designing the curriculum, incorporate student interests and experiences, and provide opportunities for inquiry-based learning and critical thinking.

Overall, the practical implications for teachers in the Bobbitt Approach are more rigid and structured, while the practical implications for teachers in the Stenhouse Approach are more flexible and student-centered. Both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, and teachers may choose to incorporate elements of both approaches in their teaching practices to best meet the needs of their students.