Orton-Gillingham vs. Wired to Read

Attribute	Orton-Gillingham	Wired to Read
Teaching Approach	Multisensory, structured, systematic	Technology-based, personalized
Target Audience	Students with dyslexia or reading difficulties	Students of all reading levels
Instructional Materials	Physical manipulatives, flashcards, worksheets	Interactive software, digital games, e-books
Teacher Training	Requires specialized training and certification	Provides online training and support

Introduction

When it comes to teaching reading to individuals with dyslexia or other learning differences, there are several approaches that have proven to be effective. Two popular methods are Orton-Gillingham and Wired to Read. Both of these programs are designed to help struggling readers improve their literacy skills, but they have some key differences in their approaches and methodologies.

Orton-Gillingham

Orton-Gillingham is a structured, multisensory approach to teaching reading that was developed in the 1930s by Dr. Samuel Orton and Anna Gillingham. This method is based on the idea that individuals with dyslexia have difficulty with phonological processing, or the ability to recognize and manipulate the sounds of language. Orton-Gillingham uses a systematic, explicit approach to teaching phonics, phonemic awareness, and other foundational reading skills.

• Structured approach
• Multisensory techniques
• Focus on phonological processing
• Systematic, explicit instruction

Wired to Read

Wired to Read is a more modern approach to teaching reading that incorporates technology and personalized learning. This program uses a combination of online activities, games, and assessments to help students improve their reading skills. Wired to Read also focuses on building vocabulary, comprehension, and fluency through engaging, interactive lessons.

• Technology-based approach
• Personalized learning
• Online activities and games
• Focus on vocabulary, comprehension, and fluency

Comparison

While both Orton-Gillingham and Wired to Read aim to improve reading skills in struggling readers, they have some distinct differences in their approaches. Orton-Gillingham is known for its structured, multisensory techniques that focus on phonological processing and explicit instruction. This method is often used in one-on-one or small group settings with a trained instructor.

On the other hand, Wired to Read takes a more technology-based approach, using online activities and games to engage students in learning. This program allows for more personalized learning experiences and can be used in a variety of settings, including classrooms and at home.

Orton-Gillingham is often recommended for individuals with dyslexia or other learning differences who need a highly structured, systematic approach to learning to read. This method has been proven to be effective for many students, particularly when taught by a trained professional.

Wired to Read, on the other hand, may be a better fit for students who are more comfortable with technology and enjoy interactive, online learning experiences. This program can be a great option for students who may not have access to a trained Orton-Gillingham instructor or who prefer a more independent learning style.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Orton-Gillingham and Wired to Read are effective methods for teaching reading to struggling readers. Orton-Gillingham is a structured, multisensory approach that focuses on phonological processing and explicit instruction, while Wired to Read is a more modern, technology-based program that offers personalized learning experiences. The best approach will depend on the individual needs and preferences of the student, as well as the resources available for instruction.