Non-technical Approach in Curriculum Development vs. Technical Approach in Curriculum Development

Attribute	Non-technical Approach in Curriculum Development	Technical Approach in Curriculum Development
Focus	Emphasis on student-centered learning and holistic development	Emphasis on content mastery and skill acquisition
Process	Collaborative and participatory approach involving teachers, students, and community	Structured and systematic approach with clear objectives and outcomes
Flexibility	Adaptable to diverse learning styles and needs	Rigid adherence to predetermined curriculum and standards
Assessment	Focus on formative assessment and qualitative feedback	Emphasis on summative assessment and quantitative measures

Introduction

Curriculum development is a crucial aspect of education that involves designing and implementing educational programs. There are two main approaches to curriculum development: non-technical and technical. Both approaches have their own set of attributes that influence the way curriculum is created and delivered.

Non-technical Approach

The non-technical approach to curriculum development focuses on the human aspect of education. This approach emphasizes the importance of understanding the needs and interests of students, as well as the social and cultural context in which learning takes place. In the non-technical approach, curriculum developers prioritize collaboration and communication with teachers, students, and other stakeholders to create a curriculum that is relevant and engaging.

One of the key attributes of the non-technical approach is flexibility. Curriculum developers using this approach are open to adapting and modifying the curriculum based on feedback and changing circumstances. This allows for a more responsive and student-centered approach to education, where the needs of learners are prioritized over rigid standards and guidelines.

Another attribute of the non-technical approach is creativity. Curriculum developers using this approach are encouraged to think outside the box and come up with innovative ways to engage students and enhance learning. This can lead to the development of unique and engaging educational programs that cater to the diverse needs and interests of students.

Additionally, the non-technical approach values inclusivity and diversity. Curriculum developers using this approach strive to create a curriculum that is accessible to all students, regardless of their background or abilities. This can lead to a more inclusive and equitable educational experience for all learners.

Overall, the non-technical approach to curriculum development prioritizes the human aspect of education, emphasizing collaboration, flexibility, creativity, inclusivity, and student-centeredness.

Technical Approach

The technical approach to curriculum development, on the other hand, focuses on the systematic and structured design of educational programs. This approach emphasizes the use of data, research, and best practices to create a curriculum that is aligned with educational standards and objectives. In the technical approach, curriculum developers rely on a more formal and standardized process to design and implement educational programs.

One of the key attributes of the technical approach is efficiency. Curriculum developers using this approach follow a structured and systematic process that is designed to streamline the development and implementation of educational programs. This can lead to a more efficient and effective curriculum development process, where resources are allocated strategically and goals are achieved in a timely manner.

Another attribute of the technical approach is accountability. Curriculum developers using this approach are focused on meeting specific educational standards and objectives, and are held accountable for the outcomes of their programs. This can lead to a more results-oriented approach to education, where success is measured based on predefined criteria and benchmarks.

Additionally, the technical approach values consistency and standardization. Curriculum developers using this approach strive to create a curriculum that is consistent across different settings and contexts, ensuring that all students receive a similar educational experience. This can lead to a more standardized and uniform approach to education, where quality and rigor are maintained across the board.

Overall, the technical approach to curriculum development prioritizes the systematic and structured design of educational programs, emphasizing efficiency, accountability, consistency, and standardization.

Comparison

• Both the non-technical and technical approaches to curriculum development have their own set of attributes that influence the way educational programs are created and delivered.
• The non-technical approach prioritizes the human aspect of education, emphasizing collaboration, flexibility, creativity, inclusivity, and student-centeredness.
• The technical approach, on the other hand, focuses on the systematic and structured design of educational programs, emphasizing efficiency, accountability, consistency, and standardization.
• While the non-technical approach allows for more flexibility and creativity in curriculum development, the technical approach ensures efficiency and accountability in meeting educational standards and objectives.
• Both approaches have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two depends on the specific needs and goals of the educational program.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the non-technical and technical approaches to curriculum development each have their own unique attributes that influence the way educational programs are created and delivered. The non-technical approach prioritizes the human aspect of education, emphasizing collaboration, flexibility, creativity, inclusivity, and student-centeredness. The technical approach, on the other hand, focuses on the systematic and structured design of educational programs, emphasizing efficiency, accountability, consistency, and standardization. Both approaches have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two depends on the specific needs and goals of the educational program.