Neo-Nazi vs. Neocon

Attribute	Neo-Nazi	Neocon
Ideology	White supremacy, anti-Semitism	Conservative, interventionist
Beliefs	Racial purity, anti-immigration	Support for military intervention, free market capitalism
History	Rooted in Nazism, fascism	Emerged in the 1960s, influenced by Cold War politics
Violence	Advocates for violence and terrorism	Supports military action, but within legal and ethical boundaries
Political Goals	Establish white ethnostate, eliminate non-white races	Promote democracy, American exceptionalism

Beliefs and Ideologies

Neo-Nazis are individuals who adhere to a white supremacist ideology, believing in the superiority of the white race and advocating for the preservation of a white-dominated society. They often promote anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, and anti-LGBTQ views, and may use violence to achieve their goals. On the other hand, Neoconservatives, or Neocons, are individuals who support a hawkish foreign policy, advocating for military intervention and the spread of democracy around the world. They believe in American exceptionalism and prioritize national security and defense.

Political Affiliations

Neo-Nazis are typically associated with far-right extremist groups and may align themselves with white nationalist political parties. They often reject mainstream political parties and institutions, viewing them as part of a corrupt system that needs to be dismantled. Neocons, on the other hand, are often affiliated with the Republican Party in the United States and support conservative policies on issues such as national security, foreign policy, and economics.

Use of Violence

Neo-Nazis have a history of using violence to further their agenda, including acts of terrorism, hate crimes, and attacks on marginalized communities. They may engage in street brawls, rallies, and protests to intimidate their opponents and spread fear. Neocons, on the other hand, typically do not condone violence as a means of achieving their goals, instead preferring to use diplomatic and military strategies to advance their foreign policy objectives.

Views on Immigration

Neo-Nazis are staunchly opposed to immigration, particularly from non-white or non-European countries, viewing it as a threat to the racial purity of their society. They may advocate for strict border controls, deportation of immigrants, and the preservation of a homogenous population. Neocons, on the other hand, may have varying views on immigration, with some supporting stricter border enforcement and others advocating for more lenient policies to attract skilled workers and boost the economy.

Attitudes Towards Diversity

Neo-Nazis reject diversity and multiculturalism, believing that different racial and ethnic groups should be segregated and that mixing races will lead to the degradation of society. They may promote the idea of a white ethnostate where only individuals of European descent are allowed to live. Neocons, on the other hand, may support diversity in certain contexts, such as in the workplace or educational institutions, but may also prioritize assimilation and unity under a common national identity.

Approach to Foreign Policy

Neo-Nazis tend to focus on domestic issues related to race and ethnicity, with little emphasis on foreign policy matters. Their primary goal is to establish a white supremacist society within their own country, rather than engage in international affairs. Neocons, on the other hand, are known for their interventionist foreign policy approach, advocating for military action to promote democracy and American interests abroad, even if it means engaging in conflicts with other nations.

Support for Authoritarianism

Neo-Nazis may express support for authoritarian leaders who share their nationalist and supremacist views, seeing them as strong figures who can protect their interests and uphold their values. They may admire dictators who crack down on dissent and maintain strict control over their populations. Neocons, on the other hand, generally support democratic principles and institutions, advocating for the spread of democracy and human rights around the world, even if it means confronting authoritarian regimes.