vs.

Motorola Atrix vs. Samsung Galaxy S II

What's the Difference?

The Motorola Atrix and Samsung Galaxy S II are both popular smartphones that were released around the same time. The Atrix features a 4-inch display, while the Galaxy S II has a slightly larger 4.3-inch screen. In terms of performance, the Galaxy S II is equipped with a more powerful processor and offers smoother multitasking capabilities. However, the Atrix stands out with its unique feature of being able to dock into a laptop-like accessory, providing a desktop-like experience. Both phones have good camera quality and offer a range of connectivity options. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on personal preferences and priorities, such as display size, processing power, and the need for a desktop-like experience.

Comparison

AttributeMotorola AtrixSamsung Galaxy S II
Operating SystemAndroidAndroid
ProcessorDual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9Dual-core 1.2GHz ARM Cortex-A9
RAM1GB1GB
Display4.0 inches, 540 x 960 pixels4.3 inches, 480 x 800 pixels
Camera5 MP (rear), VGA (front)8 MP (rear), 2 MP (front)
Storage16GB internal, expandable up to 32GB16GB/32GB internal, expandable up to 32GB
Battery1930 mAh1650 mAh
Weight135 grams116 grams

Further Detail

Design and Display

The Motorola Atrix features a sleek and modern design with a solid build quality. It has a 4-inch TFT capacitive touchscreen display with a resolution of 540 x 960 pixels. The display offers vibrant colors and good viewing angles, making it enjoyable for multimedia consumption and gaming.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II boasts a slim and lightweight design. It features a 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus capacitive touchscreen display with a resolution of 480 x 800 pixels. The Super AMOLED Plus technology provides deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast, resulting in a visually stunning experience.

In terms of design and display, both devices offer their own unique appeal. The Motorola Atrix focuses on a solid and modern design, while the Samsung Galaxy S II impresses with its slim profile and visually striking Super AMOLED Plus display.

Performance and Hardware

The Motorola Atrix is powered by a dual-core 1GHz processor and 1GB of RAM, providing smooth multitasking and efficient performance. It comes with 16GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD card slot. The device also features a fingerprint sensor for added security.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II is equipped with a dual-core 1.2GHz processor and 1GB of RAM, delivering fast and responsive performance. It offers 16GB or 32GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD card slot. The device also supports NFC (Near Field Communication) for convenient wireless communication.

Both devices offer powerful hardware and smooth performance, making them capable of handling demanding tasks and running resource-intensive applications. The Motorola Atrix stands out with its fingerprint sensor, while the Samsung Galaxy S II impresses with its NFC support.

Camera

The Motorola Atrix features a 5-megapixel rear camera with autofocus and LED flash. It is capable of capturing decent photos with good color reproduction and detail. The device also has a front-facing VGA camera for video calls and selfies.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II sports an 8-megapixel rear camera with autofocus and LED flash. It delivers excellent image quality with sharp details and accurate colors. The device also includes a 2-megapixel front-facing camera for video calls and self-portraits.

When it comes to the camera, the Samsung Galaxy S II takes the lead with its higher resolution and superior image quality. However, the Motorola Atrix still offers a decent camera experience for everyday photography needs.

Battery Life

The Motorola Atrix is equipped with a 1930mAh removable battery, providing a decent amount of power to keep the device running throughout the day. However, heavy usage may require a mid-day recharge.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II comes with a 1650mAh removable battery. It offers good battery life, allowing users to comfortably use the device for a full day with moderate usage. However, heavy usage may still require a recharge before the day ends.

Both devices offer satisfactory battery life, but the Motorola Atrix has a slight advantage with its larger battery capacity. However, it's worth noting that battery life can vary depending on individual usage patterns and settings.

Software and Features

The Motorola Atrix runs on Android 2.2 Froyo, which can be upgraded to Android 2.3 Gingerbread. It offers a clean and user-friendly interface with access to the Google Play Store for a wide range of applications and games.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II originally launched with Android 2.3 Gingerbread and is upgradeable to Android 4.1 Jelly Bean. It features Samsung's TouchWiz user interface, which provides additional customization options and features.

Both devices offer access to the Google Play Store and a wide range of applications. The Samsung Galaxy S II has an advantage with its newer Android version and additional customization options through the TouchWiz interface.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Motorola Atrix and Samsung Galaxy S II offer impressive features and performance. The Motorola Atrix stands out with its solid design, fingerprint sensor, and larger battery capacity. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II impresses with its slim profile, visually stunning Super AMOLED Plus display, superior camera, NFC support, and newer Android version.

Ultimately, the choice between the two devices depends on individual preferences and priorities. If design, fingerprint sensor, and battery life are important factors, the Motorola Atrix may be the better choice. However, if a slim profile, superior display, camera quality, NFC support, and newer software are more appealing, the Samsung Galaxy S II would be the recommended option.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.