Meeting Style American vs. Meeting Style Vietnam

Attribute	Meeting Style American	Meeting Style Vietnam
Communication Style	Direct and assertive	Indirect and polite
Decision Making Process	Often hierarchical with input from various levels	Consensus-based with input from all participants
Time Management	Meetings tend to be punctual and time-bound	Meetings may run longer than scheduled
Formality	Can be informal with casual attire	More formal with appropriate attire

American Meeting Style

American meeting style is often characterized by a structured and formal approach. Meetings typically start on time and follow a predetermined agenda. Participants are expected to come prepared with their ideas and contributions. The communication style is often direct and to the point, with a focus on efficiency and productivity. Decision-making is usually hierarchical, with the leader or manager making the final call.

• Structured and formal approach
• Starts on time and follows agenda
• Direct communication style
• Focus on efficiency and productivity
• Hierarchical decision-making

Vietnamese Meeting Style

Vietnamese meeting style, on the other hand, tends to be more informal and relationship-oriented. Meetings may start late and often involve small talk and socializing before getting down to business. Participants may not always stick to a strict agenda and discussions can be more fluid and open-ended. Decision-making is often consensus-based, with an emphasis on group harmony and consensus.

• Informal and relationship-oriented
• May start late and involve small talk
• Discussions are more fluid and open-ended
• Consensus-based decision-making
• Emphasis on group harmony

Comparison

When comparing American and Vietnamese meeting styles, it is clear that there are significant differences in approach and communication. American meetings are more structured and focused on efficiency, while Vietnamese meetings are more relaxed and focused on building relationships. Decision-making processes also differ, with Americans favoring a hierarchical approach and Vietnamese preferring consensus.

One key difference is the role of hierarchy in meetings. In American meetings, the leader or manager often takes charge and makes decisions, while in Vietnamese meetings, decisions are often made collectively by the group. This reflects broader cultural values around individualism and collectivism.

Another difference is the communication style. Americans tend to be more direct and to the point in meetings, while Vietnamese may use more indirect and nuanced communication styles. This can sometimes lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations between participants from different cultural backgrounds.

Additionally, the role of relationships in meetings is important to consider. In Vietnamese culture, building relationships and trust is crucial to successful collaboration, so meetings may involve more socializing and relationship-building activities. In American culture, while relationships are important, the focus is often more on achieving results and meeting objectives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, American and Vietnamese meeting styles differ in terms of structure, communication, decision-making, and relationship-building. Understanding these differences is crucial for effective cross-cultural communication and collaboration. By recognizing and respecting the cultural norms and values that shape meeting styles, individuals from different backgrounds can work together more effectively and achieve better outcomes.