Mahayana vs. Theravada

What's the Difference?

Mahayana and Theravada are two major branches of Buddhism that differ in their beliefs and practices. Mahayana, which means "Great Vehicle," is more prevalent in East Asia, including countries like China, Japan, and Korea. It emphasizes the concept of Bodhisattva, individuals who strive to attain enlightenment for the benefit of all beings. Mahayana also places importance on compassion and the idea that anyone can achieve enlightenment. On the other hand, Theravada, also known as the "Way of the Elders," is more prominent in Southeast Asia, particularly in countries like Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Myanmar. It focuses on the teachings of the historical Buddha and the path to individual liberation through meditation and moral conduct. Theravada emphasizes the monastic life and the attainment of arhatship, the highest state of enlightenment. While both branches share the core teachings of Buddhism, their emphasis and practices differ, reflecting the diverse interpretations and cultural influences within the Buddhist tradition.


Photo by Chandan Chaurasia on Unsplash
OriginDeveloped in India around the 1st century CEOriginated in India around the 3rd century BCE
ScripturesInclude Mahayana Sutras and various other textsFollows the Pali Canon (Tipitaka)
GoalAttain Buddhahood for the benefit of all beingsAttain Nirvana and end the cycle of rebirth
Deity WorshipEmphasizes devotion to Bodhisattvas and BuddhasDoes not focus on deity worship
MonasticismMonastic communities are prominentMonasticism is central to the tradition
Views on ArhatsArhats are considered to have achieved liberation but not full enlightenmentArhats are seen as fully enlightened beings
CompassionEmphasizes compassion and the Bodhisattva idealCompassion is important but not as central as in Mahayana
SpreadSpread to East Asia, including China, Japan, and KoreaSpread to Southeast Asia, including Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Myanmar
Photo by Shivam Dewan on Unsplash

Further Detail


When exploring Buddhism, it is essential to understand the two major branches that have developed over time: Mahayana and Theravada. While both share a common foundation in the teachings of the historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, they differ in various aspects, including their beliefs, practices, and interpretations of Buddhist scriptures. This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the attributes of Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism.

Origins and Historical Development

Theravada Buddhism, also known as the "Doctrine of the Elders," traces its origins back to the early Buddhist schools that emerged after the passing of the Buddha. It is considered the more conservative and orthodox branch, preserving the original teachings and focusing on individual liberation through the practice of meditation and moral conduct.

In contrast, Mahayana Buddhism emerged several centuries later, around the 1st century CE. It originated in India and spread to various parts of Asia, including China, Japan, and Tibet. Mahayana, meaning "Great Vehicle," emphasizes the idea of universal liberation and the pursuit of becoming a bodhisattva, one who seeks enlightenment for the benefit of all sentient beings.

Doctrinal Differences

One of the fundamental distinctions between Mahayana and Theravada lies in their interpretation of the Buddhist scriptures. Theravada adheres strictly to the Pali Canon, also known as the Tripitaka, which is considered the most authentic and authoritative collection of the Buddha's teachings. It consists of three sections: the Vinaya Pitaka (rules for monastic discipline), the Sutta Pitaka (discourses of the Buddha), and the Abhidhamma Pitaka (philosophical analysis).

On the other hand, Mahayana Buddhism recognizes additional scriptures known as the Mahayana Sutras. These texts, believed to be the words of the Buddha, introduce new concepts and teachings, including the idea of the bodhisattva path and the existence of multiple Buddhas and celestial beings. The Mahayana Sutras are highly revered and considered equally important to the Pali Canon.

Goal of Practice

Theravada Buddhism places a strong emphasis on personal liberation from the cycle of birth and death, known as samsara. The ultimate goal for Theravada practitioners is to attain arhatship, a state of complete enlightenment achieved through the eradication of all defilements and the realization of the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path.

On the other hand, Mahayana Buddhism extends the goal beyond personal liberation. Mahayana practitioners aspire to become bodhisattvas, postponing their own enlightenment until all sentient beings can be liberated. The bodhisattva ideal emphasizes compassion, wisdom, and the commitment to alleviate suffering for all beings.

Role of the Buddha

In Theravada Buddhism, the Buddha is revered as an exceptional human being who achieved enlightenment through his own efforts. He is seen as an exemplary teacher and guide, but not as a divine figure. Theravada Buddhists strive to follow the Buddha's teachings and emulate his path to liberation.

Contrarily, Mahayana Buddhism elevates the Buddha to a transcendent and celestial level. Mahayana sutras describe the Buddha as an eternal, omniscient being who manifests in various forms to guide and teach sentient beings. Mahayana practitioners often engage in devotional practices, such as chanting and making offerings, to express reverence and seek the Buddha's blessings.

Role of Bodhisattvas

While both Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism acknowledge the existence of bodhisattvas, their significance and role differ. In Theravada, bodhisattvas are highly advanced practitioners who have attained a high level of spiritual realization but choose to continue their personal journey towards arhatship in seclusion. They are not actively involved in guiding others.

On the other hand, Mahayana Buddhism places great emphasis on bodhisattvas as compassionate beings who actively work for the welfare of all sentient beings. Bodhisattvas are seen as spiritual guides and protectors, capable of interceding in the lives of individuals to alleviate suffering and provide guidance on the path to enlightenment.

Monasticism and Lay Practice

Both Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism have monastic communities, but their practices and roles differ. In Theravada, monasticism is highly esteemed, and the monastic Sangha plays a central role in preserving and propagating the teachings. Monks and nuns dedicate their lives to meditation, study, and the pursuit of enlightenment.

Mahayana, while also valuing monasticism, places greater emphasis on the role of lay practitioners. Lay followers actively participate in Buddhist rituals, make offerings, and seek guidance from monastics. Mahayana Buddhism encourages laypeople to cultivate virtues, practice generosity, and support the monastic community.

Spread and Influence

Theravada Buddhism has primarily flourished in Southeast Asian countries such as Sri Lanka, Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos. It has maintained a strong connection to the original teachings and monastic traditions, making it the dominant form of Buddhism in these regions.

On the other hand, Mahayana Buddhism has spread widely across East Asia, including China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. It has undergone significant cultural adaptations and assimilation, incorporating local beliefs and practices. Mahayana has had a profound influence on art, philosophy, and social structures in these regions.


In conclusion, Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism differ in various aspects, including their origins, doctrines, goals of practice, views on the Buddha and bodhisattvas, monasticism, and influence. While Theravada focuses on individual liberation and adheres strictly to the Pali Canon, Mahayana extends the goal to universal liberation and recognizes additional scriptures. Mahayana also places greater emphasis on the role of bodhisattvas and the active involvement of lay practitioners. Understanding these differences allows for a deeper appreciation of the rich diversity within Buddhism and the various paths individuals can choose to follow on their spiritual journey.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.