KFC vs. Red Rooster

Attribute	KFC	Red Rooster
Founded	1930	1972
Origin	United States	Australia
Specialty	Fried Chicken	Roasted Chicken
Menu	Chicken, Burgers, Fries	Chicken, Burgers, Wraps
Locations	24,000+	360+

History

KFC, also known as Kentucky Fried Chicken, was founded by Colonel Harland Sanders in 1930. The fast-food chain is known for its signature fried chicken recipe that includes a blend of 11 herbs and spices. Over the years, KFC has expanded globally and has become one of the most recognizable fast-food brands in the world.

Red Rooster, on the other hand, was established in 1972 in Australia. The chain specializes in roast chicken and offers a variety of menu items including burgers, wraps, and salads. Red Rooster has grown to become a popular fast-food option in Australia, with over 360 locations across the country.

Menu

One of the main differences between KFC and Red Rooster is their menu offerings. KFC is best known for its fried chicken, which comes in a variety of options such as original recipe, extra crispy, and spicy. In addition to chicken, KFC also offers sides like mashed potatoes, coleslaw, and biscuits.

Red Rooster, on the other hand, focuses on roast chicken as its main menu item. Customers can choose from quarter, half, or whole chickens, as well as chicken burgers and wraps. Red Rooster also offers a range of sides including chips, peas, and gravy.

Taste

When it comes to taste, both KFC and Red Rooster have their own unique flavors. KFC's fried chicken is known for its crispy coating and savory blend of herbs and spices. The chicken is often described as juicy and flavorful, with a satisfying crunch.

Red Rooster's roast chicken, on the other hand, is cooked to perfection with a crispy skin and tender meat. The chicken is seasoned with a blend of herbs and spices that give it a delicious flavor. Many customers enjoy the smoky and savory taste of Red Rooster's roast chicken.

Price

Price is another factor to consider when comparing KFC and Red Rooster. KFC is generally considered to be more affordable than Red Rooster, with combo meals and value deals that offer good value for money. Customers can enjoy a filling meal at KFC without breaking the bank.

Red Rooster, on the other hand, tends to be slightly more expensive than KFC. The chain offers a range of meal deals and family packs, but the prices can add up quickly, especially for larger orders. While Red Rooster's food is of good quality, some customers may find it to be on the pricier side.

Locations

Both KFC and Red Rooster have a strong presence in Australia, with numerous locations across the country. KFC has over 600 stores in Australia, making it one of the most popular fast-food chains in the country. Customers can easily find a KFC location in most major cities and towns.

Red Rooster, on the other hand, has over 360 locations in Australia, with a focus on suburban and regional areas. While Red Rooster may not have as many stores as KFC, the chain still has a loyal customer base and is a popular choice for those looking for roast chicken and other fast-food options.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both KFC and Red Rooster offer delicious chicken options with their own unique flavors and menu offerings. While KFC is known for its fried chicken and affordable prices, Red Rooster specializes in roast chicken and has a slightly higher price point. Ultimately, the choice between KFC and Red Rooster comes down to personal preference and what type of chicken you prefer. Both chains have their own strengths and are popular choices for fast-food lovers in Australia.