Iron Aspartate vs. Iron Glycinate

Attribute	Iron Aspartate	Iron Glycinate
Solubility	Highly soluble	Highly soluble
Absorption rate	Fast absorption	Slow absorption
Bioavailability	High bioavailability	High bioavailability
Form	Aspartate form	Glycinate form
Recommended dosage	Varies	Varies

Introduction

Iron is an essential mineral that plays a crucial role in various bodily functions, including the production of red blood cells and the transportation of oxygen throughout the body. Iron deficiency is a common issue that can lead to symptoms such as fatigue, weakness, and decreased immune function. Iron supplements are often recommended to help individuals meet their daily iron needs. Two popular forms of iron supplements are iron aspartate and iron glycinate. In this article, we will compare the attributes of these two forms of iron to help you make an informed decision about which one may be best for you.

Iron Aspartate

Iron aspartate is a form of iron that is bound to the amino acid aspartic acid. This form of iron is known for its high bioavailability, meaning that it is easily absorbed by the body. Iron aspartate is often recommended for individuals who have difficulty absorbing iron from other forms. This form of iron is also less likely to cause gastrointestinal side effects such as constipation, which can be a common issue with other forms of iron supplements. Additionally, iron aspartate is less likely to interact with other medications, making it a safe option for individuals who are taking multiple medications.

Iron Glycinate

Iron glycinate is another form of iron that is bound to the amino acid glycine. Like iron aspartate, iron glycinate is highly bioavailable and easily absorbed by the body. This form of iron is also known for being gentle on the stomach, making it a good option for individuals who are prone to gastrointestinal issues. Iron glycinate is often recommended for individuals who have sensitive stomachs or who have experienced stomach upset with other forms of iron supplements. Additionally, iron glycinate is less likely to cause constipation, making it a popular choice for individuals who struggle with this side effect.

Comparison

• Both iron aspartate and iron glycinate are highly bioavailable forms of iron that are easily absorbed by the body.
• Iron aspartate is less likely to cause gastrointestinal side effects such as constipation, while iron glycinate is known for being gentle on the stomach.
• Iron aspartate is less likely to interact with other medications, making it a safe option for individuals who are taking multiple medications.
• Iron glycinate is often recommended for individuals who have sensitive stomachs or who have experienced stomach upset with other forms of iron supplements.
• Both forms of iron are effective at increasing iron levels in the body and can help alleviate symptoms of iron deficiency.

Conclusion

When choosing between iron aspartate and iron glycinate, it is important to consider your individual needs and preferences. If you have difficulty absorbing iron or are concerned about gastrointestinal side effects, iron aspartate may be the best option for you. On the other hand, if you have a sensitive stomach or have experienced stomach upset with other forms of iron supplements, iron glycinate may be a better choice. Ultimately, both forms of iron are effective at increasing iron levels in the body and can help improve symptoms of iron deficiency. Consult with your healthcare provider to determine which form of iron is best for you.