Internalization vs. Reification
What's the Difference?
Internalization and reification are both processes that involve the transformation of abstract concepts into concrete realities. Internalization refers to the process of incorporating external values, beliefs, and norms into one's own identity and worldview. This can lead to a deep understanding and acceptance of these external influences. On the other hand, reification involves the process of treating abstract concepts as if they were concrete objects or entities. This can lead to the objectification of ideas or beliefs, reducing their complexity and nuance. While internalization can lead to personal growth and understanding, reification can sometimes oversimplify complex issues and hinder critical thinking.
Comparison
Attribute | Internalization | Reification |
---|---|---|
Definition | The process of incorporating external values, beliefs, and norms into one's own identity. | The process of treating abstract concepts as if they were concrete objects. |
Origin | Psychological and sociological concept. | Philosophical concept. |
Example | Learning a new language and adopting its cultural nuances. | Considering justice as a tangible entity that can be measured and observed. |
Impact | Shapes individual identity and behavior. | Affects how abstract ideas are understood and applied. |
Further Detail
Definition
Internalization and reification are two concepts that are often discussed in the fields of psychology, sociology, and philosophy. Internalization refers to the process by which individuals adopt the beliefs, values, and norms of a particular culture or society as their own. This can happen through socialization, education, or other forms of learning. Reification, on the other hand, is the process of treating abstract concepts or ideas as if they were concrete, tangible objects. This can lead to the belief that these concepts have an independent existence outside of human thought.
Process
Internalization involves the internalization of external norms, values, and beliefs. This process occurs over time as individuals are exposed to and interact with the culture or society in which they live. Through socialization, education, and other forms of learning, individuals come to accept and internalize the beliefs and values of their culture as their own. Reification, on the other hand, involves the process of treating abstract concepts or ideas as if they were concrete, tangible objects. This can lead to the belief that these concepts have an independent existence outside of human thought.
Impact
The impact of internalization and reification can be significant. Internalization can lead to individuals adopting the beliefs, values, and norms of their culture or society as their own. This can influence their behavior, attitudes, and decision-making processes. Reification, on the other hand, can lead to the belief that abstract concepts or ideas have an independent existence outside of human thought. This can shape how individuals perceive and interact with the world around them.
Examples
One example of internalization is the process by which children learn the language, customs, and traditions of their culture through socialization and education. As they grow up, they come to accept and internalize these beliefs and values as their own. An example of reification is the belief in the existence of abstract concepts such as justice, freedom, or democracy as if they were concrete, tangible objects. This can lead to the belief that these concepts have an independent existence outside of human thought.
Criticism
Both internalization and reification have been criticized for their potential negative impacts. Internalization can lead to individuals uncritically accepting the beliefs and values of their culture or society without questioning or challenging them. This can perpetuate harmful norms and practices. Reification, on the other hand, can lead to the belief in the existence of abstract concepts as if they were concrete, tangible objects. This can limit critical thinking and creativity by treating these concepts as fixed and unchangeable.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.