Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz vs. Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz
What's the Difference?
The Intel Core i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz is a more advanced processor compared to the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz. The Core i3-2120 has a higher clock speed, better performance, and more advanced features such as hyper-threading technology. It also has a higher number of cores and threads, making it more efficient for multitasking and demanding applications. On the other hand, the Pentium Dual-Core E5800 is an older processor with lower performance and fewer features. Overall, the Core i3-2120 is a better choice for modern computing needs.
Comparison
Attribute | Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz | Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz |
---|---|---|
Processor Type | Core i3 | Pentium Dual-Core |
Base Clock Speed | 3.30GHz | 3.20GHz |
Number of Cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of Threads | 4 | 2 |
Lithography | 32nm | 45nm |
Further Detail
Introduction
When it comes to choosing a CPU for your computer, there are many factors to consider. Two popular options are the Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz and the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz. Both processors have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it's important to understand the differences between them before making a decision.
Performance
The Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz is a dual-core processor with a base clock speed of 3.30GHz. It also supports hyper-threading, which allows each core to handle two threads simultaneously. This can result in better multitasking performance and improved overall speed. On the other hand, the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz is also a dual-core processor but lacks hyper-threading support. This means it may not perform as well in multitasking scenarios compared to the i3-2120.
Cache Size
Another important factor to consider is the cache size of each processor. The Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz has a total of 3MB of cache, with 256KB of L2 cache per core and a shared 3MB L3 cache. This larger cache size can help improve performance by storing frequently accessed data closer to the CPU cores. In comparison, the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz has a total of 2MB of cache, with 1MB of L2 cache per core. While this is still a decent amount of cache, it may not be as effective as the i3-2120's larger cache size.
Integrated Graphics
One area where the Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz has an advantage is in integrated graphics performance. The i3-2120 features Intel HD Graphics 2000, which offers better graphics performance compared to the integrated graphics found in the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz. This can be beneficial for tasks that require graphics processing, such as gaming or video editing. However, if you plan to use a dedicated graphics card, this difference may not be as significant.
Power Consumption
When it comes to power consumption, the Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz is more efficient compared to the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz. The i3-2120 has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 65W, while the E5800 has a TDP of 65W. This means that the i3-2120 will consume less power and generate less heat, which can be beneficial for overall system stability and energy efficiency.
Price
Price is always an important consideration when choosing a CPU. The Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz is generally more expensive than the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz. This price difference may be justified by the i3-2120's better performance, cache size, integrated graphics, and power efficiency. However, if you are on a tight budget and don't require the extra features of the i3-2120, the E5800 may be a more cost-effective option.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the Intel® Core™ i3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz and the Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5800 3.20GHz have their own strengths and weaknesses. The i3-2120 offers better performance, larger cache size, integrated graphics, and lower power consumption, making it a great choice for users who need a more powerful processor. On the other hand, the E5800 is a more budget-friendly option that still provides decent performance for everyday tasks. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on your specific needs and budget constraints.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.