Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz vs. Intel® Pentium® CPU G3420 3.20GHz
What's the Difference?
The Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz and Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz are both processors from Intel, but they cater to different market segments. The Atom CPU is designed for low-power, energy-efficient devices such as tablets and netbooks, while the Pentium CPU is more suited for mainstream desktop computing. The Pentium CPU has a higher clock speed, which means it can handle more demanding tasks and applications compared to the Atom CPU. Overall, the Pentium CPU offers better performance for everyday computing tasks, while the Atom CPU is more focused on power efficiency and portability.
Comparison
Attribute | Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz | Intel® Pentium® CPU G3420 3.20GHz |
---|---|---|
Processor Type | Intel Atom | Intel Pentium |
Base Clock Speed | 1.60GHz | 3.20GHz |
Cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
L2 Cache | 2MB | 3MB |
L3 Cache | 4MB | NA |
Further Detail
Introduction
When it comes to choosing a CPU for your computer, there are many factors to consider. Two popular options on the market are the Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz and the Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz. Both processors have their own set of attributes that make them suitable for different types of tasks. In this article, we will compare the key features of these two CPUs to help you make an informed decision.
Performance
The Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz is a low-power processor designed for basic computing tasks such as web browsing, email, and light productivity work. It has a base clock speed of 1.60GHz and a TDP of 10W, making it energy-efficient but not ideal for demanding applications. On the other hand, the Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz is a more powerful processor with a base clock speed of 3.20GHz and a TDP of 54W. It is better suited for multitasking, gaming, and other intensive tasks that require higher processing power.
Architecture
The Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz is based on the Goldmont architecture, which is optimized for power efficiency and low-cost devices. It features 4 cores and 4 threads, allowing for basic multitasking capabilities. In comparison, the Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz is based on the Haswell architecture, which offers better performance and efficiency compared to the Atom architecture. It also has 2 cores and 2 threads, which may limit its multitasking capabilities compared to the Atom CPU.
Graphics
Both the Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz and the Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz come with integrated graphics. The Atom CPU features Intel UHD Graphics 600, which is suitable for basic graphics tasks such as video streaming and light gaming. On the other hand, the Pentium CPU comes with Intel HD Graphics, which offers better performance for gaming and multimedia tasks. However, for more demanding gaming or graphic design work, a dedicated graphics card would be recommended for both processors.
Memory Support
When it comes to memory support, the Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz supports DDR4 memory up to 2400MHz. It has a maximum memory capacity of 8GB, which is sufficient for basic computing tasks. In comparison, the Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz supports DDR3 memory up to 1333MHz. It has a maximum memory capacity of 32GB, allowing for better performance in multitasking and memory-intensive applications.
Price
One of the key factors to consider when choosing a CPU is the price. The Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz is a budget-friendly option, making it ideal for users on a tight budget or those looking for a low-cost computing solution. On the other hand, the Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz is slightly more expensive but offers better performance and capabilities for users who require more processing power.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the Intel Atom CPU C3508 1.60GHz and the Intel Pentium CPU G3420 3.20GHz have their own set of attributes that make them suitable for different types of users. The Atom CPU is a low-power processor ideal for basic computing tasks, while the Pentium CPU offers better performance for multitasking and intensive applications. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on your specific needs and budget. We hope this comparison has helped you make an informed decision.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.