Innate Criminal vs. Made Criminal

Attribute	Innate Criminal	Made Criminal
Definition	Individuals who are believed to have a predisposition towards criminal behavior due to factors such as genetics or upbringing.	Individuals who have committed a crime due to external influences or circumstances.
Causes	Biological factors, genetic predisposition, childhood experiences.	Environmental factors, peer pressure, socioeconomic conditions.
Responsibility	Debate over whether they can be held fully responsible for their actions.	Generally considered responsible for their criminal behavior.
Treatment	May require specialized interventions or therapies to address underlying issues.	May benefit from rehabilitation programs to prevent future criminal behavior.

Introduction

When it comes to criminal behavior, there are two main categories that individuals fall into: innate criminals and made criminals. Innate criminals are those who exhibit criminal tendencies from a young age, often due to genetic or psychological factors. Made criminals, on the other hand, are individuals who become involved in criminal activities later in life, often as a result of environmental influences. In this article, we will compare the attributes of innate criminals and made criminals to better understand the differences between the two.

Background

Innate criminals are often believed to have a predisposition towards criminal behavior due to factors such as genetics or early childhood experiences. These individuals may exhibit traits such as impulsivity, aggression, and a lack of empathy from a young age. Made criminals, on the other hand, may become involved in criminal activities as a result of external influences such as peer pressure, poverty, or a lack of opportunities. While both types of criminals may engage in illegal behavior, the reasons behind their actions can vary significantly.

Psychological Factors

One of the key differences between innate criminals and made criminals lies in their psychological makeup. Innate criminals may have underlying mental health issues or personality disorders that contribute to their criminal behavior. These individuals may struggle with impulse control, have difficulty forming relationships, or lack empathy for others. Made criminals, on the other hand, may be influenced by external factors such as a history of trauma, substance abuse, or a lack of social support. These individuals may turn to crime as a way to cope with their circumstances or as a means of survival.

Environmental Influences

Another important factor to consider when comparing innate criminals and made criminals is the role of environmental influences. Innate criminals may have grown up in environments that were conducive to criminal behavior, such as households where violence or substance abuse was prevalent. These individuals may have learned criminal behavior from a young age and may have few positive role models to guide them. Made criminals, on the other hand, may have been influenced by external factors such as peer pressure, poverty, or a lack of opportunities. These individuals may have turned to crime as a way to fit in with a certain social group or to meet their basic needs.

Legal Implications

From a legal perspective, the distinction between innate criminals and made criminals can have significant implications. Innate criminals may be more likely to receive harsher sentences or be deemed unfit to stand trial due to their underlying mental health issues. Made criminals, on the other hand, may be seen as more capable of rehabilitation or may be given more lenient sentences if they can demonstrate that their criminal behavior was a result of external influences. Understanding the differences between these two types of criminals can help inform legal decisions and interventions aimed at reducing criminal behavior.

Prevention and Intervention

When it comes to preventing criminal behavior, it is important to consider the unique needs of both innate criminals and made criminals. For innate criminals, early intervention and targeted mental health services may be key to addressing underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior. For made criminals, interventions that address external factors such as poverty, substance abuse, or lack of opportunities may be more effective in reducing criminal behavior. By tailoring prevention and intervention efforts to the specific needs of each type of criminal, we can work towards reducing crime rates and creating safer communities for all individuals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the attributes of innate criminals and made criminals can vary significantly, with each group facing unique challenges and circumstances. While innate criminals may have underlying psychological factors that contribute to their criminal behavior, made criminals may be influenced by external factors such as poverty, trauma, or peer pressure. Understanding the differences between these two types of criminals is essential for developing effective prevention and intervention strategies that can help reduce crime rates and improve outcomes for individuals involved in the criminal justice system.