I Was Going for vs. I Was Researching

Attribute	I Was Going for	I Was Researching
Intention	To achieve a specific goal or outcome	To gather information or knowledge
Focus	Action-oriented	Information-oriented
Result	Achievement of a goal	Acquisition of knowledge

Introduction

When it comes to writing, two common phrases that are often used are "I was going for" and "I was researching." While both phrases may seem similar on the surface, they actually have distinct attributes that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the differences between these two phrases and discuss how they are used in writing.

Definition

The phrase "I was going for" is typically used to describe the intention or goal behind a particular action or piece of writing. It implies that the writer had a specific purpose in mind when creating their work. On the other hand, "I was researching" suggests that the writer was gathering information or conducting investigations in order to support their writing. This phrase indicates a more analytical approach to the writing process.

Usage

When using the phrase "I was going for," writers often explain their creative choices or the overall theme of their work. This phrase is commonly used in discussions about art, literature, and other forms of creative expression. On the other hand, "I was researching" is frequently used in academic writing, journalism, and other fields that require a factual basis for the information presented.

Intent

One key difference between "I was going for" and "I was researching" is the intent behind the writing. The former implies a more subjective approach, where the writer's personal vision or interpretation is emphasized. In contrast, the latter suggests a more objective approach, where the writer's focus is on presenting factual information or evidence to support their claims.

Process

When a writer says "I was going for," they are often describing the creative process that led to the final product. This may involve discussing their inspirations, influences, or the emotions they were trying to evoke in their audience. On the other hand, when a writer says "I was researching," they are highlighting the investigative process that informed their writing. This may involve citing sources, conducting interviews, or analyzing data to support their arguments.

Impact

The impact of using "I was going for" versus "I was researching" can be significant in terms of how the writing is perceived by the audience. The former may be seen as more subjective and open to interpretation, while the latter may be viewed as more objective and fact-based. Depending on the context, one phrase may be more appropriate than the other in order to convey the intended message effectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while both "I was going for" and "I was researching" are common phrases used in writing, they have distinct attributes that set them apart. Understanding the differences between these two phrases can help writers communicate their intentions and approach more effectively. Whether one is aiming for a creative or analytical approach to their writing, choosing the right phrase can make a significant impact on how their work is perceived.