General vs. Systemic

Attribute	General	Systemic
Definition	Relating to or done by all people or things in a group or category	Relating to or affecting an entire system
Scope	Broader, more inclusive	Focuses on the interactions and interrelations within a system
Approach	More general, abstract	Looks at the system as a whole and its parts
Impact	May have wide-reaching effects	Considers the interconnectedness of elements within a system

Definition

General and systemic are two terms that are often used in various contexts, including medicine, biology, and management. General typically refers to something that is broad or widespread, while systemic refers to something that is related to a system or affecting the entire system. In general, general attributes are more broad and encompassing, while systemic attributes are more focused on the interconnectedness of a system.

Scope

When it comes to scope, general attributes tend to cover a wider range of topics or areas, while systemic attributes focus on the interactions and relationships within a specific system. For example, a general attribute of a company may be its overall profitability, while a systemic attribute may be the communication flow between different departments. General attributes are more about the big picture, while systemic attributes delve into the details of how different parts of a system work together.

Application

General attributes are often used to make high-level decisions or assessments, while systemic attributes are more useful for analyzing the inner workings of a system and identifying areas for improvement. For instance, a general attribute like customer satisfaction may be used to evaluate the overall performance of a business, while a systemic attribute like employee engagement may be used to pinpoint specific issues within the organization. Both types of attributes are important for understanding and managing complex systems.

Impact

General attributes can have a broad impact on an organization or system, affecting multiple areas simultaneously. Systemic attributes, on the other hand, have a more targeted impact, influencing specific processes or relationships within a system. For example, a general attribute like leadership style can have a widespread impact on company culture, while a systemic attribute like supply chain efficiency may only affect a specific aspect of the business operations.

Measurement

Measuring general attributes can be more challenging than measuring systemic attributes, as they often involve subjective criteria or qualitative data. Systemic attributes, on the other hand, can be measured more easily using quantitative data and specific metrics. For example, a general attribute like brand reputation may be measured through customer surveys and market research, while a systemic attribute like production efficiency can be measured using key performance indicators and production data.

Interrelation

General and systemic attributes are interconnected in many ways, as they both play a role in shaping the overall performance and success of a system. General attributes provide a high-level overview of the system, while systemic attributes offer insights into the inner workings and relationships within the system. By understanding and analyzing both types of attributes, organizations can make informed decisions and drive continuous improvement in their operations.