General Sherman vs. Ulysses S. Grant
What's the Difference?
General Sherman and Ulysses S. Grant were both key figures in the Union Army during the American Civil War. Sherman was known for his brutal "scorched earth" tactics, particularly during his March to the Sea campaign, while Grant was known for his relentless pursuit of victory and his willingness to engage in costly battles. Despite their differing approaches to warfare, both men were instrumental in securing Union victory and ultimately bringing an end to the Civil War.
Comparison
Attribute | General Sherman | Ulysses S. Grant |
---|---|---|
Birthdate | February 8, 1820 | April 27, 1822 |
Birthplace | Lancaster, Ohio | Point Pleasant, Ohio |
Rank | General | General |
Notable Battles | Atlanta Campaign, March to the Sea | Vicksburg Campaign, Overland Campaign |
Presidency | N/A | 18th President of the United States |
Further Detail
Background
General William Tecumseh Sherman and General Ulysses S. Grant were two of the most prominent Union generals during the American Civil War. Both men played crucial roles in the Union victory over the Confederacy, but they had different approaches and personalities that set them apart.
Leadership Style
General Sherman was known for his aggressive and ruthless tactics on the battlefield. He believed in total war and was willing to do whatever it took to achieve victory. Sherman's famous "March to the Sea" through Georgia, where his troops destroyed everything in their path, exemplified his brutal approach to warfare.
On the other hand, General Grant was more methodical and strategic in his leadership style. He was known for his determination and persistence in battle, often wearing down his opponents through attrition. Grant's siege of Vicksburg and his relentless pursuit of Robert E. Lee's army in Virginia showcased his patient and calculated approach to warfare.
Relationship with President Lincoln
General Sherman had a complicated relationship with President Abraham Lincoln. While Sherman respected Lincoln as the commander-in-chief, he often clashed with the president over military strategy and political issues. Sherman's outspoken nature and independent streak sometimes put him at odds with Lincoln's administration.
General Grant, on the other hand, had a close and trusting relationship with President Lincoln. Grant was Lincoln's top military advisor and the two men worked closely together to develop and execute the Union's war strategy. Lincoln had immense faith in Grant's abilities as a general and often deferred to his judgment on military matters.
Post-War Careers
After the Civil War, General Sherman went on to serve as the Commanding General of the United States Army. He played a key role in the Indian Wars of the late 19th century and was instrumental in the establishment of military outposts in the western United States. Sherman's "Sherman Antitrust Act" also left a lasting impact on American law and economics.
General Grant, on the other hand, was elected as the 18th President of the United States in 1868. He served two terms in office and focused on Reconstruction and civil rights during his presidency. Grant's administration was marked by corruption scandals, but he also made significant strides in promoting civil rights for African Americans.
Legacy
Both General Sherman and General Grant left lasting legacies in American history. Sherman is remembered for his brutal tactics during the Civil War and his role in shaping modern warfare. The concept of "Sherman's March" has become synonymous with total war and the destruction of civilian infrastructure.
General Grant is remembered for his leadership during the Civil War and his presidency. He is often ranked as one of the greatest generals in American history, alongside figures like George Washington and Dwight D. Eisenhower. Grant's memoirs, written as he was dying of cancer, are considered one of the greatest works of American literature.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.