Garmin Venu 3 vs. Garmin Vívoactive 5
What's the Difference?
The Garmin Venu 3 and Garmin Vívoactive 5 are both excellent smartwatches with a range of features for fitness enthusiasts. The Venu 3 offers a more stylish design with a vibrant AMOLED display, while the Vívoactive 5 has a more rugged and sporty look. Both watches have built-in GPS, heart rate monitoring, and advanced fitness tracking capabilities. The Venu 3 also includes additional health monitoring features such as stress tracking and respiration tracking, making it a great option for those looking to prioritize overall wellness. On the other hand, the Vívoactive 5 offers longer battery life and more advanced sleep tracking features. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities in terms of design, features, and battery life.
Comparison
| Attribute | Garmin Venu 3 | Garmin Vívoactive 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | AMOLED | MIP |
| Battery Life | Up to 11 days | Up to 8 days |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Heart Rate Monitor | Yes | Yes |
| Music Storage | Yes | Yes |
Further Detail
Design
Both the Garmin Venu 3 and Garmin Vívoactive 5 feature a sleek and modern design that is suitable for everyday wear. The Venu 3 has a round face with a stainless steel bezel, while the Vívoactive 5 has a more square-shaped face with a fiber-reinforced polymer case. Both watches come with interchangeable bands, allowing users to customize their look to suit their style.
One key difference in design between the two watches is the size. The Venu 3 is slightly larger and heavier than the Vívoactive 5, which may be a consideration for those with smaller wrists or who prefer a lighter watch. Overall, both watches are comfortable to wear and have a premium feel to them.
Display
When it comes to the display, the Garmin Venu 3 and Garmin Vívoactive 5 both feature vibrant and easy-to-read screens. The Venu 3 boasts a 1.3-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 416 x 416 pixels, providing sharp and clear visuals. On the other hand, the Vívoactive 5 has a 1.4-inch transflective MIP display with a resolution of 280 x 280 pixels, which may not be as crisp as the Venu 3 but offers better visibility in direct sunlight.
Both watches have touchscreen capabilities, making it easy to navigate through menus and apps. The Venu 3 also has an always-on display option, allowing users to glance at the time and their stats without having to raise their wrist or tap the screen.
Features
When it comes to features, both the Garmin Venu 3 and Garmin Vívoactive 5 offer a wide range of fitness and health tracking capabilities. Both watches come equipped with GPS, heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and stress tracking. They also offer built-in sports apps for various activities such as running, cycling, swimming, and more.
One standout feature of the Venu 3 is its advanced health monitoring tools, including a Pulse Ox sensor, Body Battery energy monitoring, and menstrual cycle tracking. The Vívoactive 5, on the other hand, offers Garmin Pay for contactless payments and music storage for offline listening.
- GPS
- Heart rate monitoring
- Sleep tracking
- Stress tracking
- Built-in sports apps
Battery Life
When it comes to battery life, the Garmin Venu 3 and Garmin Vívoactive 5 offer similar performance. The Venu 3 boasts up to 5 days of battery life in smartwatch mode and up to 6 hours in GPS mode with music. The Vívoactive 5, on the other hand, offers up to 8 days of battery life in smartwatch mode and up to 19 hours in GPS mode.
Both watches feature fast charging capabilities, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The Vívoactive 5 may have a slight edge in battery life, making it a better option for those who want to go longer between charges.
Price
When it comes to price, the Garmin Venu 3 and Garmin Vívoactive 5 are both premium smartwatches with a similar price point. The Venu 3 typically retails for around $349.99, while the Vívoactive 5 is priced at $329.99. While the Venu 3 offers advanced health monitoring features, the Vívoactive 5 may be a better value for those who prioritize battery life and music storage.
Overall, both watches offer excellent value for their price and provide a wide range of features for fitness enthusiasts and everyday users alike.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.