Galaxy S 4G vs. Samsung Galaxy S II

Attribute	Galaxy S 4G	Samsung Galaxy S II
Operating System	Android 2.2 (Froyo)	Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
Display	4.0 inches	4.3 inches
Resolution	480 x 800 pixels	480 x 800 pixels
Processor	1.0 GHz Cortex-A8	1.2 GHz Cortex-A9
RAM	512 MB	1 GB
Internal Storage	1 GB	16 GB
Camera	5 MP	8 MP
Battery	1650 mAh	1650 mAh

Introduction

The Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II are two popular smartphones released by Samsung. While both devices belong to the Galaxy S series, they have distinct features and specifications that set them apart. In this article, we will compare the attributes of the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II, exploring their design, display, performance, camera capabilities, and connectivity options.

Design

When it comes to design, the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II showcase different aesthetics. The Galaxy S 4G features a more rounded and compact design, making it comfortable to hold and use with one hand. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II boasts a sleek and slim profile with a larger display, giving it a more modern and premium look.

Both devices utilize a combination of glass and plastic materials, with the Galaxy S 4G featuring a glossy plastic back cover and the Samsung Galaxy S II incorporating a textured plastic back panel. The Galaxy S 4G offers a physical home button along with capacitive touch buttons for navigation, while the Samsung Galaxy S II opts for a capacitive touch-only interface.

In terms of dimensions, the Galaxy S 4G measures 122.4 x 64.5 x 10.9 mm and weighs 118 grams, while the Samsung Galaxy S II is slightly larger at 125.3 x 66.1 x 8.5 mm and weighs 116 grams. Both devices are lightweight and portable, but the Galaxy S II's slimmer profile gives it an edge in terms of overall design.

Display

The display is a crucial aspect of any smartphone, and both the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II offer impressive screens. The Galaxy S 4G features a 4.0-inch Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen with a resolution of 480 x 800 pixels. This display delivers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent viewing angles.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II takes the display experience to the next level with its 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus capacitive touchscreen. With a resolution of 480 x 800 pixels, it offers a larger canvas for multimedia consumption and web browsing. The Super AMOLED Plus technology enhances color reproduction and provides better outdoor visibility compared to the Galaxy S 4G.

Both devices feature multitouch support and come with accelerometer and proximity sensors. While the Galaxy S 4G's display is more than sufficient for everyday use, the Samsung Galaxy S II's larger and superior Super AMOLED Plus screen makes it the winner in this category.

Performance

Under the hood, the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II pack different hardware configurations, resulting in varying levels of performance. The Galaxy S 4G is powered by a 1GHz Cortex-A8 processor and 512MB of RAM. It offers smooth multitasking and handles most apps and games with ease.

In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy S II boasts a more powerful 1.2GHz dual-core Cortex-A9 processor and 1GB of RAM. This combination provides a significant boost in performance, allowing for seamless multitasking, faster app launches, and smoother gaming experiences.

Both devices run on Android operating systems, with the Galaxy S 4G running Android 2.2 Froyo (upgradeable to 2.3 Gingerbread) and the Samsung Galaxy S II running Android 2.3 Gingerbread (upgradeable to 4.1 Jelly Bean). While the Galaxy S 4G can handle most tasks without any issues, the Samsung Galaxy S II's superior hardware makes it the better performer overall.

Camera Capabilities

Smartphone cameras have become increasingly important, and the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II offer different camera capabilities. The Galaxy S 4G features a 5-megapixel rear camera with autofocus and an LED flash. It can capture decent photos in well-lit conditions and supports 720p video recording.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II steps up the camera game with its 8-megapixel rear camera. It also includes autofocus and an LED flash, but it offers better image quality, improved low-light performance, and the ability to record 1080p videos.

Both devices have front-facing cameras for video calls and selfies. The Galaxy S 4G sports a VGA front camera, while the Samsung Galaxy S II features a 2-megapixel front camera. The Galaxy S II's superior camera capabilities make it the winner in this category, especially for photography enthusiasts.

Connectivity Options

When it comes to connectivity, the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II offer similar options. Both devices support 2G and 3G networks, allowing for voice calls and data usage. They also come with Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n for wireless internet connectivity.

However, the Samsung Galaxy S II takes a step further by offering 4G LTE connectivity, enabling faster download and upload speeds where available. This makes it a better choice for users who require high-speed internet on the go.

Both devices feature Bluetooth 3.0 for wireless file transfers and NFC (Near Field Communication) for contactless payments and data exchange. Additionally, they come with GPS for navigation and microUSB ports for charging and data transfer.

While the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II share many connectivity options, the Galaxy S II's inclusion of 4G LTE gives it an advantage in terms of faster internet speeds.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Galaxy S 4G and Samsung Galaxy S II are both impressive smartphones with their own unique attributes. The Galaxy S 4G offers a compact design, a vibrant Super AMOLED display, decent performance, and a capable camera. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S II boasts a sleeker design, a larger and superior Super AMOLED Plus display, better performance, and an enhanced camera experience.

While the Galaxy S 4G may be a suitable choice for users seeking a more compact device, the Samsung Galaxy S II provides a more premium and feature-rich experience. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities, whether it be design, display, performance, camera capabilities, or connectivity options.