G20 vs. G8

What's the Difference?

The G20 and G8 are both international forums that bring together the world's major economies to discuss global economic issues. However, there are some key differences between the two. The G20 consists of 19 countries plus the European Union, representing around 85% of global GDP. It focuses on a broader range of issues beyond just economics, including climate change, development, and global governance. On the other hand, the G8 is a smaller group consisting of the United States, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, and Russia. It primarily focuses on economic and financial matters. In recent years, the G20 has gained more prominence and influence due to its larger membership and broader agenda, reflecting the changing global economic landscape.


Members20 countries8 countries
Represented ContinentsAll continentsNorth America, Europe
Annual SummitsYesYes
Focus AreasEconomy, Trade, Finance, Climate Change, etc.Economy, Trade, Finance, etc.
Membership CriteriaBased on economic size and regional representationBased on economic size and political influence
Current ChairItalyNone (G8 is currently suspended)

Further Detail


The G20 and G8 are two prominent international forums that bring together the world's most powerful economies to discuss global economic issues, cooperation, and policy coordination. While both groups share a similar objective of fostering economic stability and growth, they differ in terms of membership, representation, and scope. In this article, we will delve into the attributes of the G20 and G8, highlighting their similarities and differences.


The G20, or Group of Twenty, consists of 19 countries plus the European Union (EU). Its members include major economies such as the United States, China, Japan, Germany, and India, among others. The G20 represents around 85% of global GDP and two-thirds of the world's population, making it a highly influential forum for economic discussions and decision-making.

In contrast, the G8, or Group of Eight, comprises eight of the world's most industrialized nations: the United States, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, and Russia. Originally established as the G7 in 1975, Russia joined in 1998, transforming it into the G8. However, Russia's membership was suspended in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea, and the group reverted to the G7.


One of the key differences between the G20 and G8 lies in their representation. The G20 includes emerging economies, such as Brazil, China, India, and South Africa, which are not represented in the G8. This broader representation allows for a more diverse range of perspectives and ensures that the interests of developing nations are taken into account during discussions.

On the other hand, the G8 primarily represents the interests of the world's most advanced economies. While these countries hold significant economic power and influence, the exclusion of emerging economies limits the G8's ability to address global economic challenges comprehensively.

Scope and Agenda

The G20 has a broader scope and agenda compared to the G8. The G20 focuses on a wide range of economic issues, including financial stability, trade, investment, employment, and sustainable development. It also addresses pressing global challenges such as climate change, energy, and poverty reduction. The G20's comprehensive agenda reflects its aim to foster global economic cooperation and address the interconnectedness of today's world.

Conversely, the G8's agenda is more limited in scope, primarily focusing on economic and political issues among its member countries. Traditionally, the G8 discussions revolve around topics such as global economic growth, security, terrorism, and geopolitical matters. While these issues are undoubtedly important, the G8's narrower focus restricts its ability to tackle a broader range of global challenges.

Decision-Making Process

Another significant distinction between the G20 and G8 lies in their decision-making processes. In the G20, decisions are typically made through consensus among all member countries. This inclusive approach ensures that all nations have a voice in shaping global economic policies and fosters a sense of ownership and cooperation.

In contrast, the G8 operates on a more informal and flexible decision-making process. Due to its smaller membership, decisions within the G8 are often reached through informal discussions and negotiations among its members. While this approach allows for more direct and efficient decision-making, it may also limit the perspectives and input from non-member countries.

Role and Influence

Both the G20 and G8 play crucial roles in shaping global economic governance and policy coordination. However, the G20's expanded membership and broader representation give it a higher level of legitimacy and influence compared to the G8.

The G20's larger membership allows it to better reflect the diversity of the global economy and ensures that emerging economies have a seat at the table. This inclusivity enhances the G20's ability to address the needs and concerns of a wider range of countries, making its decisions more representative and impactful.

While the G8 still holds significance as a forum for advanced economies to discuss key issues, its influence has somewhat diminished due to its limited membership and exclusion of emerging economies. The G8's decisions may carry less weight in the global economic landscape, as they may not fully capture the perspectives and interests of the broader international community.


In conclusion, the G20 and G8 are both important international forums that aim to foster economic stability and growth. However, they differ in terms of membership, representation, scope, decision-making processes, and influence. The G20's broader representation, comprehensive agenda, and consensus-based decision-making make it a more inclusive and influential platform for addressing global economic challenges. On the other hand, the G8's smaller membership and narrower focus limit its ability to comprehensively tackle a wide range of issues. Ultimately, both forums have their strengths and weaknesses, and their coexistence allows for a more balanced and diverse approach to global economic governance.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.