Fujifilm X-E4 vs. Fujifilm X-T50
What's the Difference?
The Fujifilm X-E4 and Fujifilm X-T50 are both excellent mirrorless cameras from Fujifilm, known for their high-quality image output and compact design. The X-E4 is smaller and lighter than the X-T50, making it more portable and easier to carry around. However, the X-T50 has a larger grip and more physical controls, making it easier to handle and operate. Both cameras feature the same 26.1MP APS-C sensor and X-Processor 4 image processing engine, resulting in excellent image quality and performance. Ultimately, the choice between the X-E4 and X-T50 will come down to personal preference in terms of size, handling, and shooting style.
Comparison
| Attribute | Fujifilm X-E4 | Fujifilm X-T50 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 26.1 MP | 26.1 MP |
| ISO | 160-12800 (expandable to 80-51200) | 200-12800 (expandable to 100-51200) |
| Autofocus Points | 425 | 425 |
| Continuous Shooting | 20 fps | 8 fps |
| Video Resolution | 4K at 30p | 4K at 30p |
| Viewfinder | 2.36m-dot OLED EVF | 2.36m-dot OLED EVF |
Further Detail
Design and Build Quality
Both the Fujifilm X-E4 and X-T50 are well-built cameras with a premium feel. The X-E4 is more compact and lightweight, making it a great option for photographers who value portability. On the other hand, the X-T50 has a larger grip, which some users may find more comfortable to hold for extended periods. Both cameras feature a retro design that is characteristic of Fujifilm's X-series lineup.
Image Quality
When it comes to image quality, both cameras perform exceptionally well. The X-E4 and X-T50 are equipped with the same 26.1MP APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor, which delivers sharp and detailed images with excellent color reproduction. The X-E4 does not have a low-pass filter, which can result in slightly sharper images compared to the X-T50. However, both cameras produce stunning images that are suitable for professional use.
Autofocus Performance
The X-E4 and X-T50 both feature Fujifilm's advanced autofocus system, which offers fast and accurate focusing in a variety of shooting conditions. The X-E4 has 425 phase-detection autofocus points, while the X-T50 has 117 phase-detection autofocus points. This difference in autofocus points may result in slightly faster and more precise focusing with the X-E4, especially when tracking moving subjects.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras are capable of recording 4K video at up to 30fps, making them suitable for videographers as well as photographers. The X-E4 offers 10-bit 4:2:0 internal recording, which allows for greater color depth and flexibility in post-production. On the other hand, the X-T50 does not support 10-bit recording internally, but it does offer 4:2:2 8-bit output via HDMI, which can be useful for external recording.
Viewfinder and LCD Screen
The X-E4 does not have a built-in viewfinder, but it is compatible with an optional electronic viewfinder that can be attached to the hot shoe. The X-T50, on the other hand, features a built-in electronic viewfinder, which some users may prefer for composing shots in bright sunlight. Both cameras have a tilting touchscreen LCD that is useful for shooting at high or low angles.
Connectivity Options
Both cameras offer a range of connectivity options, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for easy sharing of images and remote camera control. The X-E4 also features a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer, while the X-T50 has a micro USB port. Additionally, the X-E4 has a dedicated microphone input, which is useful for capturing high-quality audio in video recordings.
Battery Life
The X-E4 and X-T50 both use the same NP-W126S battery, which provides decent battery life for a mirrorless camera. However, the X-E4 has a slightly better battery life compared to the X-T50, thanks to its more efficient power management system. This can be an important factor to consider for photographers who shoot for extended periods without access to a power source.
Price and Value
When it comes to price, the X-E4 is slightly more expensive than the X-T50. However, the X-E4 offers some additional features such as 10-bit internal recording and a more compact design, which may justify the higher price for some users. On the other hand, the X-T50 provides excellent value for money with its solid performance and versatile features, making it a great option for photographers on a budget.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.