vs.

FG 42 vs. MG42

What's the Difference?

The FG 42 and MG 42 are both German World War II firearms, but they serve different purposes on the battlefield. The FG 42 is a selective-fire rifle designed for use by paratroopers, featuring a folding stock and a shorter barrel for increased maneuverability. On the other hand, the MG 42 is a general-purpose machine gun known for its high rate of fire and reliability. While the FG 42 is more versatile and can be used in a variety of roles, the MG 42 excels in providing sustained firepower and suppressing enemy positions. Both weapons were innovative for their time and played important roles in the German war effort.

Comparison

AttributeFG 42MG42
OriginGermanyGermany
Caliber7.92×57mm Mauser7.92×57mm Mauser
Weight4.54 kg (10.0 lb)11.6 kg (25.6 lb)
Length94 cm (37 in)122 cm (48 in)
Rate of Fire750-900 rounds/min1,200 rounds/min
Effective Range400 m (440 yd)2000 m (2,200 yd)

Further Detail

Introduction

The FG 42 and MG42 are two iconic German firearms from World War II. Both weapons were used extensively by the German military during the war and are known for their reliability and effectiveness on the battlefield. In this article, we will compare the attributes of the FG 42 and MG42 to determine their strengths and weaknesses.

Design and Construction

The FG 42, also known as the Fallschirmjägergewehr 42, was designed as a lightweight and compact rifle for use by German paratroopers. It featured a folding stock and a short barrel, making it easy to carry and maneuver in tight spaces. The MG42, on the other hand, was a general-purpose machine gun designed for sustained fire. It had a longer barrel and a bipod for stability, allowing it to deliver a high rate of fire over long distances.

Caliber and Ammunition

The FG 42 was chambered in the 7.92x57mm Mauser cartridge, which was a standard rifle round used by the German military during World War II. This cartridge provided good stopping power and accuracy at medium ranges. The MG42, on the other hand, was chambered in the 7.92x57mm Mauser cartridge as well, but it was belt-fed and capable of firing at a much higher rate than the FG 42. This made the MG42 a formidable weapon in sustained fire situations.

Rate of Fire

One of the key differences between the FG 42 and MG42 is their rate of fire. The FG 42 had a relatively low rate of fire, around 500-600 rounds per minute, which made it more suitable for semi-automatic or controlled bursts. The MG42, on the other hand, had an incredibly high rate of fire, up to 1,200 rounds per minute. This allowed the MG42 to lay down a withering hail of bullets on enemy positions, making it a fearsome weapon on the battlefield.

Weight and Portability

Due to its design as a paratrooper rifle, the FG 42 was relatively lightweight and compact compared to the MG42. It weighed around 9 pounds unloaded, making it easy for soldiers to carry and maneuver in combat situations. The MG42, on the other hand, was much heavier, weighing in at around 25 pounds with a loaded bipod. This made the MG42 less portable and more suited for static defensive positions or sustained fire roles.

Accuracy and Range

Both the FG 42 and MG42 were known for their accuracy and range, but they excelled in different areas. The FG 42 was designed for precision shooting at medium ranges, with a effective range of up to 600 meters. Its semi-automatic firing mode allowed for accurate shots on target. The MG42, on the other hand, was more suited for suppressive fire at longer ranges. Its high rate of fire and belt-fed ammunition made it ideal for keeping enemy heads down and providing cover for advancing troops.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the FG 42 and MG42 were both formidable weapons used by the German military during World War II. The FG 42 excelled in its lightweight and compact design, making it ideal for paratroopers and special forces. The MG42, on the other hand, was a powerhouse of a machine gun, capable of laying down a high rate of fire and providing suppressive fire in combat situations. Both weapons had their strengths and weaknesses, but they were instrumental in the German war effort during the war.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.