vs.

Ferrous Bisglycinate vs. Iron Polymaltose

What's the Difference?

Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose are both forms of iron supplements that are commonly used to treat iron deficiency anemia. However, there are some differences between the two. Ferrous Bisglycinate is a highly bioavailable form of iron that is gentle on the stomach and less likely to cause gastrointestinal side effects. On the other hand, Iron Polymaltose is a complex of iron and maltose that is also well-tolerated and has a high absorption rate. Both supplements are effective in increasing iron levels in the body, but individuals may have different preferences based on their specific needs and tolerances.

Comparison

AttributeFerrous BisglycinateIron Polymaltose
TypeFerrous compoundIron compound
FormChelated formComplex form
AbsorptionHigh bioavailabilityHigh bioavailability
Side effectsLess likely to cause gastrointestinal issuesMay cause gastrointestinal issues
Recommended forIndividuals with low iron levelsIndividuals with anemia

Further Detail

Introduction

Iron is an essential mineral that plays a crucial role in various bodily functions, including the production of red blood cells and the transportation of oxygen throughout the body. Iron deficiency is a common issue that can lead to symptoms such as fatigue, weakness, and decreased immune function. To combat iron deficiency, many individuals turn to iron supplements. Two popular forms of iron supplements are Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose. In this article, we will compare the attributes of these two forms of iron to help you make an informed decision about which one may be best for you.

Absorption

One of the key differences between Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose is their absorption rates. Ferrous Bisglycinate is a highly bioavailable form of iron, meaning that it is easily absorbed by the body. This can be beneficial for individuals who struggle with iron absorption issues or who have sensitive stomachs that may be irritated by other forms of iron. On the other hand, Iron Polymaltose is also known for its high absorption rate, making it an effective option for those looking to increase their iron levels quickly and efficiently.

Tolerability

When it comes to tolerability, Ferrous Bisglycinate is often considered to be gentler on the stomach compared to Iron Polymaltose. This is because Ferrous Bisglycinate is less likely to cause gastrointestinal side effects such as constipation, bloating, or nausea. For individuals who have experienced stomach issues with other forms of iron, Ferrous Bisglycinate may be a more comfortable option. On the other hand, Iron Polymaltose is also well-tolerated by most individuals, but some may still experience mild stomach discomfort when taking this form of iron.

Effectiveness

Both Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose are effective forms of iron that can help increase iron levels in the body. However, some studies suggest that Ferrous Bisglycinate may be slightly more effective at raising hemoglobin levels compared to Iron Polymaltose. This may be due to the higher bioavailability of Ferrous Bisglycinate, which allows for more efficient absorption of iron into the bloodstream. That being said, Iron Polymaltose is still a highly effective form of iron that can help improve iron levels in individuals with deficiency.

Side Effects

While both Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose are generally well-tolerated, they may still cause side effects in some individuals. Common side effects of iron supplements include constipation, stomach upset, and darkening of the stool. However, these side effects are typically mild and can be managed by adjusting the dosage or taking the supplement with food. It is important to consult with a healthcare provider before starting any iron supplement to ensure that it is safe and appropriate for your individual needs.

Cost

Cost can also be a factor to consider when choosing between Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose. In general, Ferrous Bisglycinate tends to be more expensive than Iron Polymaltose. This may be due to the higher bioavailability and effectiveness of Ferrous Bisglycinate compared to Iron Polymaltose. However, the cost difference may not be significant for some individuals, especially if they find that Ferrous Bisglycinate is more tolerable and effective for them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose are effective forms of iron that can help improve iron levels in individuals with deficiency. Ferrous Bisglycinate is known for its high bioavailability and gentle tolerability, making it a popular choice for those with sensitive stomachs. On the other hand, Iron Polymaltose is also well-absorbed and tolerated by most individuals, making it a reliable option for increasing iron levels. Ultimately, the choice between Ferrous Bisglycinate and Iron Polymaltose will depend on individual preferences, tolerability, and budget considerations.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.