Father Divine Angry vs. Jim Jones Angry

Attribute	Father Divine Angry	Jim Jones Angry
Reaction	Remained calm and composed	Became aggressive and violent
Communication style	Used persuasive language	Used manipulative tactics
Leadership approach	Emphasized peace and unity	Exercised control and dominance
Followers' response	Respected and admired	Fearful and obedient

Background

Both Father Divine and Jim Jones were charismatic leaders who founded religious movements in the United States during the 20th century. Father Divine, born George Baker, established the Peace Mission movement in the 1930s, promoting racial equality and economic empowerment. Jim Jones, on the other hand, founded the Peoples Temple in the 1950s, advocating for social justice and communal living.

Attributes of Father Divine Angry

When Father Divine became angry, his followers described him as being stern and authoritative. He would often speak in a booming voice, commanding attention and respect from his followers. Father Divine's anger was usually directed towards those who disobeyed his teachings or questioned his authority. His followers believed that his anger was justified and necessary for maintaining order within the movement.

One of the key attributes of Father Divine's anger was his ability to instill fear in his followers. Many of his followers believed that his anger was a form of divine punishment, meant to correct their behavior and bring them closer to God. Father Divine's anger was seen as a tool for discipline and spiritual growth within the Peace Mission movement.

Despite his anger, Father Divine was also known for his compassion and forgiveness. He would often forgive his followers for their transgressions, showing a more gentle and understanding side to his personality. This duality in his character made him a complex and enigmatic figure within the Peace Mission movement.

Attributes of Jim Jones Angry

Jim Jones's anger was often described as explosive and unpredictable. When he became angry, his followers would fear for their safety and well-being. Jones would often lash out verbally and physically, using fear and intimidation to control his followers. His anger was seen as a tool for manipulation and control within the Peoples Temple.

One of the key attributes of Jim Jones's anger was his ability to instill blind loyalty in his followers. Many of his followers believed that his anger was a sign of his passion and commitment to their cause. Jones's anger was seen as a necessary evil for achieving social justice and equality within the Peoples Temple.

Unlike Father Divine, Jim Jones's anger was rarely accompanied by compassion or forgiveness. He was known for his ruthless and unforgiving nature, often excommunicating or punishing those who dared to question his authority. Jones's anger was a means of maintaining power and control over his followers, creating a culture of fear and obedience within the Peoples Temple.

Comparison

While both Father Divine and Jim Jones exhibited anger as a means of maintaining control within their respective movements, there were key differences in how they expressed their anger. Father Divine's anger was seen as a form of discipline and spiritual guidance, whereas Jim Jones's anger was used as a tool for manipulation and control.

• Father Divine's anger was often accompanied by compassion and forgiveness, while Jim Jones's anger was characterized by ruthlessness and unforgiving nature.
• Father Divine's followers believed that his anger was a form of divine punishment, meant to correct their behavior and bring them closer to God, whereas Jim Jones's followers saw his anger as a sign of his passion and commitment to their cause.
• Overall, Father Divine's anger was seen as a necessary aspect of spiritual growth and discipline within the Peace Mission movement, while Jim Jones's anger was used as a means of maintaining power and control over his followers within the Peoples Temple.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the attributes of Father Divine angry and Jim Jones angry were distinct in their expression and purpose within their respective movements. Father Divine's anger was characterized by sternness and authority, used as a tool for discipline and spiritual growth. Jim Jones's anger, on the other hand, was marked by explosiveness and manipulation, serving as a means of control and power. Despite these differences, both leaders used anger as a means of maintaining order and loyalty within their movements, albeit with varying degrees of compassion and forgiveness.