Experiment vs. Survey

What's the Difference?

Experiment and survey are two common research methods used in various fields. An experiment involves manipulating variables to observe the effect on a dependent variable, while a survey involves collecting data through questionnaires or interviews to gather information about a specific topic. Both methods have their advantages and limitations. Experiments allow researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships and control variables, but they may lack external validity. On the other hand, surveys provide a broader perspective and can be conducted on a larger scale, but they rely on self-reporting and may be subject to response bias. Ultimately, the choice between experiment and survey depends on the research question, resources, and the desired level of control and generalizability.


Photo by Julia Koblitz on Unsplash
MethodologyControlled environment with manipulated variablesQuestionnaire or interview-based data collection
PurposeTo test hypotheses and establish cause-effect relationshipsTo gather information and opinions from participants
Sample SizeUsually smaller sample sizesCan have larger sample sizes
Data CollectionDirect observation or measurementResponses to questions or statements
ControlControlled variables to minimize confounding factorsNo control over variables, relies on participant responses
TimeCan take longer to conductUsually quicker to administer
AnalysisStatistical analysis to determine significanceData summarized and analyzed for patterns or trends
GeneralizabilityResults can be generalized to larger populationsResults may not be generalizable due to sample bias
Photo by Lukas Blazek on Unsplash

Further Detail


When conducting research, it is essential to gather data and analyze it to draw meaningful conclusions. Two common methods used for data collection are experiments and surveys. Both approaches have their own unique attributes and can be valuable in different research contexts. In this article, we will explore the characteristics of experiments and surveys, highlighting their strengths and limitations.


Experiments are research designs that involve manipulating variables to observe the effects on other variables. They are often conducted in controlled environments, allowing researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships. One of the key attributes of experiments is their ability to control and manipulate variables. By randomly assigning participants to different groups, researchers can ensure that any observed differences are due to the manipulated variables rather than other factors.

Another important attribute of experiments is their ability to establish temporal precedence. In other words, experiments can determine the order of events, allowing researchers to conclude that the manipulation of the independent variable caused the observed changes in the dependent variable. This attribute is particularly valuable when studying the effects of interventions or treatments.

Experiments also provide researchers with a high level of internal validity. By controlling extraneous variables, experiments minimize the influence of confounding factors, increasing the confidence in the causal relationship between the independent and dependent variables. This attribute is especially important when making claims about cause and effect.

However, experiments also have some limitations. One of the main challenges is the potential lack of external validity. Since experiments are often conducted in controlled settings, the findings may not generalize to real-world situations. This limitation can be addressed by conducting field experiments or using a combination of laboratory and field settings.

Another limitation of experiments is the ethical considerations involved in manipulating variables. In some cases, it may not be feasible or ethical to manipulate certain variables, limiting the use of experiments in specific research areas. Additionally, experiments can be time-consuming and costly, requiring careful planning and resources.


Surveys, on the other hand, are research methods that involve collecting data through self-report measures. They typically involve asking participants a series of questions to gather information about their attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, or characteristics. Surveys are widely used in social sciences and market research due to their versatility and efficiency.

One of the key attributes of surveys is their ability to collect data from a large number of participants. Surveys can be administered to a large sample size, providing researchers with a broader perspective and increasing the generalizability of the findings. This attribute is particularly valuable when studying population-level trends or making inferences about a larger population.

Surveys also allow researchers to collect data on a wide range of variables. From demographic information to opinions and preferences, surveys can capture various aspects of individuals' experiences. This flexibility makes surveys suitable for exploratory research, hypothesis testing, and descriptive studies.

Another advantage of surveys is their cost-effectiveness. Compared to experiments, surveys are often less time-consuming and require fewer resources. With the advancement of technology, online surveys have become increasingly popular, enabling researchers to reach a larger audience at a lower cost.

However, surveys also have limitations. One of the main challenges is the potential for response bias. Participants may provide inaccurate or biased responses due to social desirability bias, memory recall issues, or misunderstanding of the questions. Researchers need to carefully design surveys, use appropriate response scales, and consider potential biases when interpreting the results.

Another limitation of surveys is the reliance on self-report measures. Since surveys rely on participants' subjective responses, they may not always reflect their actual behaviors or experiences. This limitation can be mitigated by combining surveys with other data collection methods, such as observations or objective measurements.


Experiments and surveys are both valuable research methods with their own unique attributes. Experiments provide researchers with control over variables, establish cause-and-effect relationships, and offer high internal validity. However, they may lack external validity and face ethical and resource constraints. On the other hand, surveys allow for data collection from a large number of participants, capture a wide range of variables, and are cost-effective. Nevertheless, surveys may be prone to response bias and rely on self-report measures. Ultimately, the choice between experiments and surveys depends on the research question, context, and available resources, and researchers often employ a combination of both methods to gain a comprehensive understanding of their research topic.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.