Deliberation Model vs. Integrated Course Design

Attribute	Deliberation Model	Integrated Course Design
Focus	Decision-making process	Curriculum development
Approach	Collaborative discussion and analysis	Systematic planning and alignment
Goal	Reaching consensus or informed decision	Creating cohesive and effective course structure
Participants	Stakeholders, experts, community members	Faculty, instructional designers, administrators

Introduction

When it comes to designing courses, educators have a variety of models and approaches to choose from. Two popular methods are the Deliberation Model and Integrated Course Design. Both models have their own unique attributes and benefits that can help educators create effective and engaging courses for their students.

Deliberation Model

The Deliberation Model is a structured approach to course design that focuses on engaging students in critical thinking and discussion. This model emphasizes the importance of deliberative dialogue, where students are encouraged to explore different perspectives and engage in respectful debate. The Deliberation Model often involves the use of case studies, simulations, and other interactive activities to promote active learning and student engagement.

• Focuses on critical thinking and discussion
• Encourages deliberative dialogue
• Uses case studies and simulations
• Promotes active learning
• Emphasizes respectful debate

Integrated Course Design

Integrated Course Design is a holistic approach to course design that focuses on aligning course goals, assessments, and activities to create a cohesive learning experience for students. This model emphasizes the importance of backward design, where educators start with the end goals in mind and work backwards to create assessments and activities that support those goals. Integrated Course Design often involves the use of learning outcomes, rubrics, and other tools to ensure that all course components are aligned and support student learning.

• Focuses on aligning course goals, assessments, and activities
• Emphasizes backward design
• Uses learning outcomes and rubrics
• Creates a cohesive learning experience
• Ensures all course components are aligned

Comparison

While both the Deliberation Model and Integrated Course Design have their own unique attributes, they also share some similarities. Both models emphasize the importance of student engagement and active learning, albeit in different ways. The Deliberation Model focuses on promoting critical thinking and discussion through interactive activities, while Integrated Course Design focuses on aligning course components to create a cohesive learning experience.

One key difference between the two models is their approach to course design. The Deliberation Model is more focused on the process of engaging students in dialogue and debate, while Integrated Course Design is more focused on the end goals of the course and how to align assessments and activities to support those goals. Educators can choose the model that best fits their teaching style and goals for their course.

Conclusion

Both the Deliberation Model and Integrated Course Design offer valuable approaches to course design that can help educators create engaging and effective learning experiences for their students. By understanding the unique attributes of each model, educators can choose the approach that best fits their teaching style and goals for their course. Whether using the Deliberation Model to promote critical thinking and discussion or Integrated Course Design to create a cohesive learning experience, educators have a variety of tools at their disposal to create impactful courses for their students.