Conventional Lightning Protection vs. Early Streamer Emission Type Lightning Protection

Attribute	Conventional Lightning Protection	Early Streamer Emission Type Lightning Protection
Technology	Uses traditional lightning rods and conductors	Utilizes early streamer emission technology
Trigger Mechanism	Passive system that relies on lightning striking the rod	Active system that emits a streamer to attract lightning
Effectiveness	May not always provide complete protection	Claims to offer better protection and earlier detection
Installation	Requires proper placement and grounding of rods	Needs to be installed by trained professionals

Introduction

Lightning is a powerful force of nature that can cause significant damage to buildings, structures, and electrical systems. To protect against the destructive power of lightning strikes, lightning protection systems are installed on buildings and structures. Two common types of lightning protection systems are Conventional Lightning Protection and Early Streamer Emission (ESE) Type Lightning Protection. In this article, we will compare the attributes of these two types of lightning protection systems.

Conventional Lightning Protection

Conventional Lightning Protection systems have been used for many years and are based on the principle of providing a low-resistance path for lightning to follow to the ground. These systems typically consist of lightning rods, conductors, and grounding systems. When lightning strikes a building or structure with a conventional lightning protection system, the lightning rod intercepts the lightning strike and safely conducts it to the ground through the conductors and grounding system.

One of the key attributes of Conventional Lightning Protection systems is their simplicity and reliability. These systems have been used for decades and have a proven track record of effectively protecting buildings and structures from lightning strikes. Additionally, Conventional Lightning Protection systems are relatively easy to install and maintain, making them a cost-effective option for many building owners.

However, one of the limitations of Conventional Lightning Protection systems is their ability to provide protection over a large area. These systems are typically designed to protect a specific building or structure and may not provide adequate protection for surrounding areas. Additionally, Conventional Lightning Protection systems may not be as effective in areas with high levels of lightning activity.

In summary, Conventional Lightning Protection systems are a reliable and cost-effective option for protecting buildings and structures from lightning strikes. However, they may have limitations in terms of providing protection over a large area and in areas with high levels of lightning activity.

Early Streamer Emission Type Lightning Protection

Early Streamer Emission (ESE) Type Lightning Protection systems are a newer technology that is designed to provide enhanced protection against lightning strikes. These systems work by emitting a streamer of ionized air that extends towards the approaching lightning strike, effectively increasing the radius of protection around the building or structure.

One of the key attributes of ESE Type Lightning Protection systems is their ability to provide protection over a larger area compared to Conventional Lightning Protection systems. The extended radius of protection provided by ESE systems can be particularly beneficial for buildings and structures located in areas with high levels of lightning activity.

Additionally, ESE Type Lightning Protection systems are designed to be more sensitive to the approach of a lightning strike, allowing them to trigger earlier than Conventional Lightning Protection systems. This early triggering can help to reduce the risk of damage from a lightning strike and provide enhanced protection for the building or structure.

However, one of the limitations of ESE Type Lightning Protection systems is their higher cost compared to Conventional Lightning Protection systems. The advanced technology and design of ESE systems can result in a higher upfront cost for installation. Additionally, ESE systems may require more maintenance and monitoring to ensure they are functioning properly.

In summary, ESE Type Lightning Protection systems offer enhanced protection over a larger area and can trigger earlier than Conventional Lightning Protection systems. However, they may come with a higher cost and require more maintenance compared to Conventional Lightning Protection systems.

Conclusion

Both Conventional Lightning Protection and Early Streamer Emission Type Lightning Protection systems have their own set of attributes and limitations. Conventional Lightning Protection systems are reliable and cost-effective but may have limitations in providing protection over a large area. On the other hand, ESE Type Lightning Protection systems offer enhanced protection over a larger area and can trigger earlier but may come with a higher cost and require more maintenance. Building owners should carefully consider their specific needs and budget when choosing a lightning protection system for their building or structure.