Convention vs. Treaty

What's the Difference?

Convention and treaty are both legal agreements between two or more parties, but they differ in their scope and nature. A convention is typically a gathering or meeting where representatives from different countries or organizations come together to discuss and negotiate specific issues or topics. It is a platform for exchanging ideas and opinions, aiming to reach a consensus or agreement on certain matters. On the other hand, a treaty is a formal written agreement that outlines specific obligations and rights of the parties involved. It is a legally binding document that establishes rules and regulations, often addressing broader and more complex issues such as international relations, trade, or human rights. While conventions are more informal and flexible, treaties are more structured and enforceable.


DefinitionA formal agreement between multiple parties, typically governments or international organizations, to regulate a specific matter.A legally binding agreement between two or more states or international organizations, usually addressing a broader range of issues than a convention.
Legally BindingYesYes
Parties InvolvedMultiple parties, such as governments or international organizations.Two or more states or international organizations.
ScopeUsually addresses a specific matter or issue.Can address a broader range of issues.
EnforcementMay have mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing compliance.May have mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing compliance.
International RecognitionGenerally recognized at the international level.Generally recognized at the international level.
ExamplesVienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

Further Detail


Conventions and treaties are two important legal instruments used in international relations to establish rules, regulations, and agreements between countries. While both serve similar purposes, there are distinct differences in their attributes and implications. In this article, we will explore and compare the attributes of conventions and treaties, shedding light on their unique characteristics and the contexts in which they are commonly used.

Definition and Scope

A convention is a formal agreement between multiple parties, typically nations, to regulate specific matters of common concern. It is often used to address issues such as human rights, environmental protection, or trade regulations. Conventions are usually open for participation by all countries and are binding upon those who ratify or accede to them.

A treaty, on the other hand, is a legally binding agreement between two or more sovereign states. Treaties can cover a wide range of subjects, including territorial boundaries, military alliances, or economic cooperation. Unlike conventions, treaties are negotiated and entered into by specific parties, and their provisions are legally binding only on those parties.

Formation and Negotiation

Conventions are typically negotiated and drafted by international organizations or bodies, such as the United Nations or specialized agencies. These organizations play a crucial role in facilitating discussions and reaching consensus among participating countries. The negotiation process involves multiple rounds of meetings, consultations, and the drafting of a final text that reflects the common understanding and agreement of the participating states.

Treaties, on the other hand, are usually negotiated directly between the parties involved. Bilateral treaties involve two countries, while multilateral treaties involve three or more countries. The negotiation process for treaties can be complex and time-consuming, often requiring extensive diplomatic efforts and compromises to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. Once the parties have reached a consensus, the treaty is signed and may require ratification or accession by the respective countries to become legally binding.

Legal Status and Binding Nature

Conventions are generally considered to have a higher degree of legal status and binding nature compared to treaties. Once a convention is ratified or acceded to by a country, it becomes legally binding on that country, and it is expected to comply with the provisions outlined in the convention. Conventions often establish international norms and standards, and non-compliance can result in diplomatic consequences or legal actions.

Treaties, on the other hand, are binding only on the parties that have signed and ratified them. The obligations and commitments outlined in a treaty are specific to the parties involved and do not automatically apply to other countries. However, treaties can still have significant implications, as they create legal obligations between the parties and provide a framework for cooperation and dispute resolution.

Enforcement and Implementation

Conventions are typically enforced through international mechanisms established by the participating countries. These mechanisms may include monitoring bodies, dispute settlement procedures, or international courts. The enforcement of conventions relies on the cooperation and compliance of the parties involved, as well as the willingness of the international community to hold non-compliant states accountable.

Treaties, on the other hand, often include provisions for dispute resolution and enforcement mechanisms specific to the parties involved. These mechanisms can range from diplomatic negotiations and mediation to arbitration or adjudication by international courts. The enforcement of treaties relies on the commitment of the parties to fulfill their obligations and the effectiveness of the agreed-upon dispute resolution mechanisms.

Flexibility and Adaptability

Conventions are generally more flexible and adaptable compared to treaties. As conventions involve a larger number of participating countries, they often allow for a wider range of interpretations and implementation approaches. This flexibility enables countries with different legal systems, cultural backgrounds, or levels of development to adopt and implement the convention in a manner that suits their specific circumstances.

Treaties, on the other hand, tend to be more specific and precise in their provisions, as they are negotiated between a limited number of parties. The language and obligations outlined in a treaty are often tailored to the specific needs and interests of the parties involved. This specificity can limit the flexibility of treaties, making it more challenging to adapt to changing circumstances or accommodate the interests of non-party states.


In conclusion, conventions and treaties are essential tools in international relations, serving distinct purposes and having different attributes. Conventions are broader in scope, involving multiple parties and addressing matters of common concern. They have a higher degree of legal status and binding nature, often establishing international norms and standards. Treaties, on the other hand, are more specific and binding only on the parties involved, focusing on bilateral or multilateral agreements. While conventions offer more flexibility and adaptability, treaties provide a precise framework for cooperation and dispute resolution. Understanding the attributes and implications of conventions and treaties is crucial for navigating the complex landscape of international relations and promoting global cooperation.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.