Control Plan vs. PFMEA

What's the Difference?

Control Plan and PFMEA (Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) are both important tools used in quality management systems. While they have different purposes, they complement each other in ensuring the effectiveness of a process. A Control Plan outlines the specific steps and actions that need to be taken to control and monitor a process. It includes details such as process parameters, inspection methods, and frequency of checks. The Control Plan focuses on preventing defects and ensuring that the process meets the desired quality standards. It acts as a roadmap for operators and provides a systematic approach to process control. On the other hand, PFMEA is a proactive risk assessment tool that identifies potential failure modes, their causes, and the potential effects on the process or product. It helps in identifying and prioritizing areas of improvement to prevent failures from occurring. PFMEA focuses on analyzing potential risks and developing appropriate actions to mitigate them. It helps in designing robust processes by addressing potential failure modes and their impact on quality. In summary, while a Control Plan focuses on controlling and monitoring a process to meet quality standards, PFMEA helps in identifying and mitigating potential risks and failures. Both tools are essential in ensuring the effectiveness and reliability of a process.


AttributeControl PlanPFMEA
DefinitionA document that outlines the specific steps and actions required to ensure product quality and process control.A systematic approach to identify and prioritize potential failure modes in a process or product and develop actions to prevent or mitigate them.
PurposeTo provide detailed instructions for controlling and monitoring critical process parameters to ensure product quality.To identify and address potential failure modes and their effects on product quality, safety, or customer satisfaction.
FocusProcess control and monitoring.Risk identification and mitigation.
TimingDeveloped after the PFMEA and used during production.Developed before the Control Plan and used during process design.
InputsPFMEA, process flow diagram, process parameters, customer requirements.Process flow diagram, product design, process parameters, historical data, customer requirements.
OutputsControl methods, inspection plans, process monitoring techniques.Recommended actions to prevent or mitigate failure modes, risk priority numbers (RPNs).
ScopeSpecific to a particular process or product.Applies to the entire process or product.
DocumentationIncludes detailed instructions, checklists, and records of process control activities.Includes a list of identified failure modes, their potential causes, effects, and recommended actions.

Further Detail


When it comes to ensuring quality and minimizing risks in manufacturing processes, two commonly used tools are Control Plan and Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA). Both of these tools play a crucial role in identifying potential failures, implementing preventive measures, and establishing control mechanisms. While they serve different purposes, they are interconnected and complement each other in the pursuit of process improvement and risk mitigation.

Control Plan

A Control Plan is a systematic document that outlines the steps and actions required to maintain process control and ensure product quality. It serves as a roadmap for operators, supervisors, and quality personnel to understand the critical characteristics of a product or process and the associated control measures. The primary purpose of a Control Plan is to prevent defects, reduce variation, and meet customer requirements consistently.

Control Plans typically include information such as process steps, process parameters, control methods, inspection requirements, and reaction plans. They provide a structured approach to monitor and control key process inputs and outputs, ensuring that the desired quality standards are met. Control Plans are often developed in collaboration with cross-functional teams, including engineering, production, quality, and supply chain, to ensure comprehensive coverage and alignment.

Key attributes of a Control Plan include:

  • Identification of critical process steps and control points
  • Specification of process parameters and tolerances
  • Definition of control methods and techniques
  • Establishment of inspection and testing requirements
  • Documentation of reaction plans for non-conformities
  • Integration with other quality management tools, such as Statistical Process Control (SPC)


Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) is a proactive risk assessment tool used to identify and prioritize potential failure modes within a process. It aims to anticipate and prevent failures by analyzing the potential causes, effects, and severity of failures, as well as the likelihood of their occurrence. PFMEA is typically conducted during the early stages of process development or when introducing changes to existing processes.

PFMEA involves a systematic approach to identify failure modes, assess their potential impact, and develop appropriate mitigation actions. It helps organizations understand the risks associated with each process step and prioritize improvement efforts accordingly. By addressing potential failure modes proactively, organizations can reduce the likelihood of defects, improve process reliability, and enhance customer satisfaction.

Key attributes of PFMEA include:

  • Identification of potential failure modes and their causes
  • Assessment of the severity, occurrence, and detection of failures
  • Assignment of risk priority numbers (RPN) to prioritize actions
  • Development of preventive and corrective actions
  • Documentation of lessons learned and best practices
  • Integration with other risk management tools, such as Control Plans and Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA)

Interconnection and Complementarity

While Control Plans and PFMEA serve different purposes, they are interconnected and complement each other in several ways. Control Plans rely on the insights gained from PFMEA to identify critical process steps, control points, and associated control measures. PFMEA, on the other hand, benefits from the information provided by Control Plans to assess the effectiveness of existing controls and develop additional preventive measures.

Control Plans and PFMEA share a common goal of preventing defects and ensuring process stability. Control Plans focus on the implementation of control measures to maintain process control, while PFMEA focuses on identifying potential failures and developing preventive actions. By integrating the outputs of PFMEA into Control Plans, organizations can establish robust control mechanisms that address the identified risks and prevent failures from occurring.

Furthermore, Control Plans and PFMEA both contribute to the continuous improvement of processes. Control Plans provide a framework for monitoring and measuring process performance, allowing organizations to identify opportunities for improvement and implement corrective actions. PFMEA, on the other hand, helps organizations learn from past failures and develop preventive measures to avoid similar issues in the future.


Control Plans and PFMEA are essential tools in the pursuit of quality and risk mitigation in manufacturing processes. While Control Plans focus on maintaining process control and meeting customer requirements, PFMEA helps identify potential failures and develop preventive actions. By integrating these tools and leveraging their interconnection, organizations can establish robust control mechanisms, reduce defects, and continuously improve their processes. Both Control Plans and PFMEA play a vital role in ensuring product quality, customer satisfaction, and overall business success.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.