Communism vs. Marxist Leninism
What's the Difference?
Communism and Marxist Leninism are both ideologies that advocate for a classless society where the means of production are owned collectively by the people. However, Marxist Leninism is a specific form of communism that was developed by Vladimir Lenin, which emphasizes the need for a vanguard party to lead the proletariat in the revolution and establish a socialist state. Marxist Leninism also places a strong emphasis on the role of the state in guiding the transition to communism, while traditional communism envisions a more decentralized and spontaneous revolution. Ultimately, while both ideologies share similar goals, Marxist Leninism offers a more structured and centralized approach to achieving them.
Comparison
Attribute | Communism | Marxist Leninism |
---|---|---|
Founder | Karl Marx | Vladimir Lenin |
Goal | Classless society | Dictatorship of the proletariat |
Role of the state | Withers away in the end | Dictatorship of the proletariat |
Economic system | Communal ownership of the means of production | State-controlled economy |
Internationalism | Global revolution | Socialism in one country |
Further Detail
Definition and Origins
Communism is a political and economic ideology that advocates for a classless society where the means of production are owned collectively. It aims to create a society where wealth and resources are distributed equally among all members. The origins of communism can be traced back to the works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 19th century. Marxist Leninism, on the other hand, is a political theory that builds upon the ideas of Marx and Lenin, emphasizing the need for a vanguard party to lead the working class in the revolution. It was developed by Vladimir Lenin in the early 20th century as a way to implement communism in Russia.
Role of the State
In communism, the state is expected to wither away as the society transitions to a classless system. The ultimate goal is to have a stateless society where individuals govern themselves. Marxist Leninism, however, sees the state as a necessary tool to achieve communism. Lenin believed that a strong centralized state was needed to guide the working class in the revolution and to protect the gains of the proletariat from counter-revolutionary forces. This led to the establishment of a one-party state in countries that adopted Marxist Leninism as their guiding ideology.
Economic System
Both communism and Marxist Leninism advocate for a planned economy where the means of production are owned collectively. In a communist society, resources are distributed based on need rather than profit. This means that everyone has access to the basic necessities of life without the need for money. Marxist Leninism, on the other hand, emphasizes the role of the state in planning and directing the economy. The state controls the means of production and allocates resources according to the needs of the society as determined by the vanguard party.
Role of the Vanguard Party
One of the key differences between communism and Marxist Leninism is the role of the vanguard party. In communism, there is no need for a vanguard party as the working class is expected to lead the revolution and govern themselves. Marx believed that the proletariat would naturally rise up against the bourgeoisie and establish a classless society. In contrast, Marxist Leninism argues that a vanguard party composed of professional revolutionaries is necessary to guide the working class in the revolution. This party acts as the vanguard of the proletariat, leading the way towards communism.
Internationalism vs. Socialism in One Country
Communism is inherently internationalist, advocating for the overthrow of capitalism on a global scale. Marx believed that the working class had no country and that the revolution should be a worldwide phenomenon. In contrast, Marxist Leninism introduced the concept of "socialism in one country," arguing that it was possible for a single country to build socialism and communism on its own. This idea was put into practice in the Soviet Union under Stalin, who focused on building socialism within the borders of the USSR rather than spreading the revolution internationally.
Conclusion
In conclusion, communism and Marxist Leninism share many similarities in their goals of creating a classless society where resources are owned collectively. However, they differ in their approach to achieving this goal, particularly in the role of the state, the vanguard party, and the international spread of the revolution. While communism aims for a stateless society governed by the working class, Marxist Leninism sees the state as a necessary tool to guide the revolution and build socialism. Both ideologies have had a significant impact on the course of history, shaping the political landscape of the 20th century.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.