Classical Progressivism vs. Modern Progressivism

Attribute	Classical Progressivism	Modern Progressivism
Time Period	Late 19th to early 20th century	20th century to present
Focus	Labor rights, women's suffrage, child labor laws	Social justice, environmentalism, LGBTQ+ rights
Government Role	Advocated for government intervention to address social issues	Advocates for government intervention to address social and economic inequality
Economic Views	Supported progressive income tax, regulation of big business	Supports wealth redistribution, minimum wage laws
Equality	Advocated for equal rights for all individuals	Advocates for equality across race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.

Origins

Classical Progressivism emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as a response to the social and economic challenges brought about by industrialization. Figures like Jane Addams and John Dewey advocated for social reform, education, and political change to address issues such as poverty, child labor, and corruption. Their focus was on improving the lives of the working class and marginalized groups through grassroots activism and community organizing.

Modern Progressivism, on the other hand, has its roots in the mid-20th century and gained momentum in the 21st century. Influenced by movements like civil rights, feminism, and environmentalism, modern progressives focus on issues such as racial and gender equality, climate change, healthcare, and LGBTQ rights. They advocate for government intervention and social programs to address systemic inequalities and promote social justice.

Approach to Government

Classical Progressives believed in a more limited role for government, emphasizing the importance of local communities and voluntary associations in addressing social problems. They saw government as a tool for reform but also recognized the potential for corruption and inefficiency. Their approach was more decentralized and focused on empowering individuals and communities to create change from the bottom up.

Modern Progressives, on the other hand, advocate for a more active and interventionist role for government in addressing social and economic issues. They support policies like universal healthcare, a living wage, and environmental regulations to promote equality and protect the most vulnerable members of society. Modern progressives see government as a necessary force for social progress and believe in using its power to create a more just and equitable society.

Focus on Social Issues

Classical Progressives focused primarily on economic and labor issues, such as improving working conditions, regulating monopolies, and expanding access to education. They were concerned with the impact of industrialization on society and sought to address the inequalities and injustices it created. Their efforts laid the groundwork for many of the social welfare programs and labor laws we have today.

Modern Progressives, on the other hand, have expanded their focus to include a wider range of social issues, such as racial justice, gender equality, LGBTQ rights, and environmental sustainability. They see these issues as interconnected and believe that progress on one front is essential for progress on others. Modern progressives advocate for intersectional approaches to social change that address the root causes of inequality and discrimination.

Approach to Activism

Classical Progressives engaged in grassroots activism and community organizing to bring about social change. Figures like Jane Addams and Upton Sinclair worked closely with working-class communities to address their needs and empower them to advocate for their rights. They believed in the power of collective action and saw social change as a collaborative effort.

Modern Progressives, on the other hand, have embraced new forms of activism, such as social media campaigns, online petitions, and protest movements. They use technology and social media to mobilize supporters, raise awareness, and pressure policymakers to take action on key issues. Modern progressives also emphasize the importance of diversity and inclusion in their activism, recognizing the need to amplify the voices of marginalized communities.

Conclusion

While Classical Progressivism and Modern Progressivism share a commitment to social reform and justice, they differ in their approach to government, focus on social issues, and methods of activism. Classical Progressives emphasized community empowerment and grassroots organizing, while Modern Progressives advocate for government intervention and use technology to mobilize support. Both movements have made significant contributions to social progress and continue to shape the political landscape today.