vs.

Chinese Exclusion Act vs. Gentleman Agreement

What's the Difference?

The Chinese Exclusion Act and the Gentleman's Agreement were both discriminatory policies enacted in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Chinese Exclusion Act, passed in 1882, prohibited Chinese laborers from immigrating to the United States and was the first law to restrict immigration based on nationality. The Gentleman's Agreement, reached in 1907 between the United States and Japan, restricted Japanese immigration to the United States by informal agreement rather than through legislation. Both policies were a response to anti-immigrant sentiment and economic competition, but the Gentleman's Agreement was seen as a more diplomatic and less overtly discriminatory approach compared to the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Comparison

AttributeChinese Exclusion ActGentleman Agreement
Year Enacted18821907
Target GroupChinese immigrantsJapanese immigrants
Legislation TypeFederal lawInformal agreement
Reason for ImplementationAnti-Chinese sentiment and labor competitionPressure from Japan and discrimination concerns
Duration60 years4 years

Further Detail

Background

The Chinese Exclusion Act and the Gentleman Agreement were two significant pieces of legislation that aimed to restrict immigration to the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Chinese Exclusion Act, passed in 1882, was the first law in American history to restrict immigration based on nationality or race. It specifically targeted Chinese immigrants, who were seen as a threat to American jobs and culture. The Gentleman Agreement, on the other hand, was an informal agreement between the United States and Japan, reached in 1907, to limit Japanese immigration to the United States.

Scope of Restrictions

The Chinese Exclusion Act was a federal law that explicitly banned Chinese laborers from entering the United States for a period of 10 years. It also prohibited Chinese immigrants already in the country from becoming naturalized citizens. The act was later extended and made permanent in 1902. In contrast, the Gentleman Agreement did not involve any formal legislation. Instead, it was a diplomatic agreement between the United States and Japan that restricted the immigration of Japanese laborers to the United States. The agreement was based on mutual understanding and cooperation between the two countries.

Enforcement

The Chinese Exclusion Act was strictly enforced by immigration officials at ports of entry, who were tasked with identifying and excluding Chinese immigrants attempting to enter the country. Chinese immigrants were subjected to intense scrutiny and often faced discrimination and harassment. In contrast, the Gentleman Agreement relied on voluntary compliance from both the United States and Japan. Japanese immigrants were encouraged to adhere to the terms of the agreement, which limited their numbers and ensured that they were not subjected to the same level of discrimination as Chinese immigrants.

Impact on Immigrants

The Chinese Exclusion Act had a profound impact on Chinese immigrants in the United States. It led to the separation of families, as many Chinese laborers were unable to bring their wives and children to join them in America. Chinese immigrants also faced widespread discrimination and violence, as they were seen as a threat to American jobs and society. The Gentleman Agreement, on the other hand, had a more subtle impact on Japanese immigrants. While it did restrict their numbers, it also helped to protect them from the same level of discrimination and violence faced by Chinese immigrants.

Legacy

The Chinese Exclusion Act was a landmark piece of legislation that set a precedent for future immigration restrictions based on nationality and race. It was not fully repealed until 1943, when the Magnuson Act allowed a limited number of Chinese immigrants to enter the United States. The Gentleman Agreement, on the other hand, was never codified into law and eventually became obsolete as diplomatic relations between the United States and Japan improved. However, both pieces of legislation serve as reminders of a dark chapter in American history when immigration was restricted based on discriminatory beliefs and fears.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.