Bspwm vs. i3

Attribute	Bspwm	i3
Window Tiling	Yes	Yes
Manual Window Management	Yes	Yes
Dynamic Workspaces	Yes	Yes
Configuration File	~/.config/bspwm/bspwmrc	~/.config/i3/config
Bar Support	Third-party bars	i3bar
Window Switching	Manual	Manual

Introduction

When it comes to tiling window managers for Linux, Bspwm and i3 are two popular choices among users. Both of these window managers offer a unique set of features and customization options that cater to different preferences and workflows. In this article, we will compare the attributes of Bspwm and i3 to help you decide which one may be the best fit for your needs.

Configuration

One of the key differences between Bspwm and i3 lies in their configuration methods. Bspwm uses a simple configuration file that allows users to define their keybindings and other settings in a straightforward manner. On the other hand, i3 utilizes a more complex configuration file that may require a steeper learning curve for beginners. However, i3's configuration file also offers more advanced customization options, making it a favorite among power users who want to fine-tune every aspect of their window manager.

Usability

When it comes to usability, both Bspwm and i3 excel in providing a seamless tiling experience for users. Bspwm is known for its minimalistic approach, with a focus on efficiency and simplicity. Its keybindings are intuitive and easy to remember, making it a great choice for users who prefer a lightweight and straightforward window manager. On the other hand, i3 offers a more feature-rich experience with a wide range of customization options and plugins. While this may be overwhelming for some users, it also allows for a more tailored and personalized workflow.

Performance

In terms of performance, both Bspwm and i3 are lightweight window managers that consume minimal system resources. Bspwm is particularly praised for its speed and efficiency, making it a great choice for users with older hardware or limited resources. i3 also performs well in terms of speed and responsiveness, although its additional features and customization options may result in slightly higher resource usage compared to Bspwm. Ultimately, both window managers offer excellent performance without sacrificing functionality.

Community and Support

Another important aspect to consider when choosing between Bspwm and i3 is the community and support available for each window manager. i3 has a larger and more active user base, with a dedicated community forum and extensive documentation that can help users troubleshoot issues and discover new tips and tricks. Bspwm, on the other hand, has a smaller but passionate community that is known for its helpfulness and willingness to assist new users. While i3 may offer more resources and support, Bspwm's community is known for its friendliness and sense of camaraderie.

Customization

Customization is a key aspect of any tiling window manager, and both Bspwm and i3 offer a high degree of flexibility in this regard. Bspwm allows users to create custom layouts and define their own keybindings with ease, thanks to its simple configuration file. i3, on the other hand, offers a wide range of customization options, including the ability to create custom status bars, themes, and plugins. While i3 may have a steeper learning curve when it comes to customization, it also provides more advanced tools for users who want to personalize every aspect of their window manager.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Bspwm and i3 are excellent choices for users looking for a tiling window manager that offers speed, efficiency, and customization options. Bspwm is a great option for users who prefer a minimalistic and lightweight window manager, while i3 caters to those who want a more feature-rich and customizable experience. Ultimately, the choice between Bspwm and i3 comes down to personal preference and workflow requirements. Whether you prioritize simplicity and speed or advanced customization and functionality, both Bspwm and i3 have something to offer for every type of user.