Brown and Pehrson's vs. Tuckman's

Attribute	Brown and Pehrson's	Tuckman's
Focus	Team development	Group dynamics
Stages	Forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning	Forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning
Leadership	Shared leadership	Leader-facilitator
Communication	Open communication	Effective communication

Introduction

Team development models are essential tools for understanding the stages that teams go through as they work together towards a common goal. Two popular models in this field are Brown and Pehrson's model and Tuckman's model. While both models aim to explain the dynamics of team development, they have distinct attributes that set them apart. In this article, we will compare and contrast the key features of Brown and Pehrson's model and Tuckman's model.

Overview of Brown and Pehrson's Model

Brown and Pehrson's model of team development consists of five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. In the forming stage, team members come together and get to know each other. This is followed by the storming stage, where conflicts may arise as team members express their opinions and ideas. The norming stage is when the team establishes norms and rules for working together effectively. The performing stage is where the team is highly productive and achieves its goals. Finally, the adjourning stage is when the team disbands after completing its task.

Key Attributes of Brown and Pehrson's Model

• Five stages of team development
• Focus on conflict resolution
• Emphasis on establishing norms and rules
• Recognition of the temporary nature of teams
• Clear progression from forming to adjourning

Overview of Tuckman's Model

Tuckman's model of team development consists of four stages: forming, storming, norming, and performing. In the forming stage, team members come together and get acquainted with each other. The storming stage is characterized by conflicts and disagreements as team members assert their opinions. The norming stage is when the team establishes norms and rules for working together harmoniously. The performing stage is where the team is highly productive and achieves its goals.

Key Attributes of Tuckman's Model

• Four stages of team development
• Focus on conflict resolution
• Emphasis on establishing norms and rules
• Recognition of the temporary nature of teams
• Clear progression from forming to performing

Comparing Brown and Pehrson's and Tuckman's Models

Both Brown and Pehrson's model and Tuckman's model share similarities in their focus on conflict resolution, emphasis on establishing norms and rules, and recognition of the temporary nature of teams. However, there are also key differences between the two models. One notable distinction is the number of stages in each model. Brown and Pehrson's model has five stages, while Tuckman's model has four stages. This difference in the number of stages can impact how teams perceive their progress and development.

Another difference between the two models is the sequencing of the stages. In Brown and Pehrson's model, the stages progress from forming to adjourning, with a clear endpoint when the team disbands. On the other hand, Tuckman's model progresses from forming to performing, with a focus on the team's productivity and goal achievement. This difference in sequencing can influence how teams approach their tasks and interactions throughout the development process.

Additionally, Brown and Pehrson's model places a strong emphasis on conflict resolution throughout the stages of team development. The model recognizes that conflicts are a natural part of team dynamics and provides a framework for addressing and resolving them. In contrast, while Tuckman's model also acknowledges the presence of conflicts in the storming stage, it may not provide as detailed guidance on how to manage and resolve these conflicts effectively.

Furthermore, both models highlight the importance of establishing norms and rules for effective team collaboration. By setting clear expectations and guidelines for behavior, teams can work together more cohesively and achieve their goals efficiently. However, the specific strategies and approaches recommended by each model for establishing these norms may vary, leading to differences in how teams implement and enforce them.

In conclusion, both Brown and Pehrson's model and Tuckman's model offer valuable insights into the stages of team development and the dynamics that teams experience as they work together towards a common goal. While both models share similarities in their focus on conflict resolution, emphasis on establishing norms and rules, and recognition of the temporary nature of teams, they also have distinct attributes that set them apart. By understanding the key features of each model, teams can better navigate the challenges and opportunities that arise during the team development process.