Brodifacoum vs. Bromadiolone

What's the Difference?

Brodifacoum and Bromadiolone are both highly effective anticoagulant rodenticides commonly used for rodent control. However, there are some differences between the two. Brodifacoum is a second-generation anticoagulant that is known for its high potency and long-lasting effects. It is often used in situations where resistance to first-generation anticoagulants is observed. On the other hand, Bromadiolone is a first-generation anticoagulant that is slightly less potent than Brodifacoum but still highly effective. It is often used in situations where a quick knockdown of rodent populations is required. Both rodenticides are widely used and have proven to be effective in controlling rodent infestations.


Chemical FormulaC31H23BrO3C30H23BrO4
Mode of ActionAnticoagulantAnticoagulant
Target PestsRats, mice, volesRats, mice, voles
Half-lifeApproximately 20-130 daysApproximately 20-130 days

Further Detail


Brodifacoum and bromadiolone are two commonly used rodenticides that belong to the anticoagulant class of chemicals. These substances are widely used for controlling rodent populations in various settings, including residential, commercial, and agricultural areas. While both compounds are effective in eliminating rodents, they differ in several attributes, including potency, persistence, and potential risks. In this article, we will explore and compare the key attributes of brodifacoum and bromadiolone to provide a comprehensive understanding of their similarities and differences.


When it comes to potency, brodifacoum is considered to be more potent than bromadiolone. Brodifacoum is a second-generation anticoagulant that requires a lower lethal dose to effectively eliminate rodents. It acts by inhibiting the production of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, leading to internal bleeding and eventual death. On the other hand, bromadiolone is a first-generation anticoagulant that requires a higher dose to achieve the same level of efficacy. While both compounds are effective, brodifacoum's higher potency allows for a quicker and more efficient control of rodent populations.


Another important attribute to consider is the persistence of these rodenticides. Brodifacoum has a longer half-life compared to bromadiolone, meaning it remains active in the environment for a longer period. This extended persistence allows for a sustained control of rodent populations, reducing the need for frequent reapplication. However, the prolonged presence of brodifacoum in the environment also poses potential risks to non-target species, including birds, mammals, and reptiles. Bromadiolone, on the other hand, has a shorter half-life and dissipates more quickly, minimizing the risk of secondary poisoning and environmental accumulation.


Both brodifacoum and bromadiolone are effective in controlling rodent populations, but their modes of action differ slightly. Brodifacoum is known for its high efficacy against rats and mice, including those that have developed resistance to other anticoagulant rodenticides. Its potency allows for a rapid reduction in rodent numbers, making it a preferred choice in situations where immediate control is necessary. Bromadiolone, while slightly less potent, is still highly effective against rodents. It is particularly useful in situations where a slower acting rodenticide is desired, allowing for a more gradual decline in rodent populations.


Resistance is a significant concern when using anticoagulant rodenticides. Rodents can develop resistance to these compounds over time, rendering them less effective in controlling populations. However, brodifacoum has shown a lower incidence of resistance compared to bromadiolone. This is likely due to brodifacoum's higher potency, which makes it more difficult for rodents to develop resistance mechanisms. Nonetheless, it is important to rotate between different rodenticides to prevent resistance from developing and to ensure continued efficacy in rodent control programs.

Regulatory Considerations

Regulatory considerations are crucial when using rodenticides, as they help ensure the safe and responsible use of these chemicals. Both brodifacoum and bromadiolone are subject to regulatory restrictions and guidelines. The specific regulations may vary between countries and regions, but generally, these compounds require proper licensing and adherence to specific application protocols. It is essential to consult local regulations and follow recommended practices to minimize potential risks to human health, non-target species, and the environment.


In conclusion, brodifacoum and bromadiolone are two widely used rodenticides that share the common goal of controlling rodent populations. While brodifacoum is more potent and persistent, bromadiolone offers a slightly different mode of action and dissipates more quickly. Both compounds are effective in their own right, but brodifacoum's higher potency allows for a quicker reduction in rodent numbers. However, it is important to consider the potential risks associated with brodifacoum's extended persistence and the development of resistance. Ultimately, the choice between brodifacoum and bromadiolone depends on the specific requirements of the rodent control program and the regulatory considerations in place.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.