Be the Inventor of vs. Contrive

Attribute	Be the Inventor of	Contrive
Definition	to create or devise something new	to plan or devise a scheme or idea
Origin	Derived from the concept of being the originator of an idea or invention	Derived from the Latin word "contrivere" meaning to devise or plan
Implies	Being the first to come up with an idea or invention	Coming up with a clever or cunning plan
Usage	Commonly used in the context of innovation and creativity	Commonly used in the context of scheming or plotting

Introduction

When it comes to creativity and innovation, two popular games that come to mind are Be the Inventor of and Contrive. Both games challenge players to think outside the box and come up with unique solutions to various problems. In this article, we will compare the attributes of these two games and explore the differences between them.

Gameplay

Be the Inventor of is a game that encourages players to invent new products or solutions to everyday problems. Players draw cards with different prompts and have to come up with creative ideas based on those prompts. The game is open-ended and allows for a wide range of possibilities. On the other hand, Contrive is a game that focuses on building contraptions using various materials and components. Players have to follow specific rules and guidelines to create their contraptions, making it a more structured and strategic game.

Flexibility

One of the key differences between Be the Inventor of and Contrive is the level of flexibility they offer to players. Be the Inventor of allows players to come up with any idea they can think of, without any restrictions. This freedom can lead to more creative and out-of-the-box solutions. Contrive, on the other hand, has more limitations in terms of the materials and components that can be used, as well as the rules that need to be followed. This can make it more challenging for players to come up with unique solutions.

Strategy

While both Be the Inventor of and Contrive require players to think strategically, the type of strategy involved in each game is different. In Be the Inventor of, players have to think creatively and come up with innovative ideas to solve the prompts on the cards. This requires thinking outside the box and exploring different possibilities. In Contrive, players have to plan their contraptions carefully and consider how each component will work together to achieve the desired outcome. This requires more logical and structured thinking.

Collaboration

Another aspect to consider when comparing Be the Inventor of and Contrive is the level of collaboration involved in each game. Be the Inventor of can be played individually or in teams, allowing players to work together to come up with creative solutions. This can lead to interesting discussions and the sharing of different perspectives. Contrive, on the other hand, is more focused on individual gameplay, as players have to build their contraptions on their own. While players can still discuss their ideas with others, the game is more about individual creativity and problem-solving.

Learning Curve

When it comes to the learning curve, Be the Inventor of is generally easier to pick up and play, as it does not have as many rules or restrictions as Contrive. Players can jump right into the game and start coming up with ideas without needing a lot of guidance. Contrive, on the other hand, has more rules and guidelines that players need to follow, which can make it more challenging for beginners. However, once players understand the rules and mechanics of the game, they can start to strategize and plan their contraptions more effectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Be the Inventor of and Contrive are both fun and engaging games that challenge players to think creatively and come up with innovative solutions. While Be the Inventor of offers more flexibility and freedom for players to explore their creativity, Contrive provides a more structured and strategic gameplay experience. Both games have their own unique attributes and can appeal to different types of players. Whether you prefer open-ended creativity or structured problem-solving, there is something for everyone to enjoy in these two games.