Be Subject to vs. Be Subjected to
What's the Difference?
"Be subject to" and "be subjected to" are both phrases that involve being under the influence or control of something or someone else. However, "be subject to" implies a voluntary acceptance or compliance with a certain authority or rule, while "be subjected to" suggests a more passive or involuntary experience of being placed under the authority or control of another. In essence, the former implies a sense of choice or willingness, while the latter implies a sense of imposition or force.
Comparison
Attribute | Be Subject to | Be Subjected to |
---|---|---|
Definition | Being under the control or influence of something | Being made to experience something |
Active vs Passive | Active | Passive |
Agent | The subject itself | External force or entity |
Volition | May involve choice or consent | Usually involuntary |
Further Detail
Definition
When we talk about being subject to something, it means being under the influence or control of that thing. It implies that one is affected by or exposed to a particular situation or condition. On the other hand, being subjected to something means being made to experience or endure that thing. It suggests that one is being acted upon or imposed upon by an external force.
Usage
The phrase "be subject to" is often used in a more general sense to describe a state of being vulnerable or susceptible to something. For example, "All employees are subject to the company's policies." On the other hand, "be subjected to" is used when someone or something is being forced to undergo a specific action or treatment. For instance, "The prisoners were subjected to harsh interrogation techniques."
Agency
One key difference between "be subject to" and "be subjected to" is the presence of agency. When someone is subject to something, it may imply a passive acceptance of the situation. However, when someone is subjected to something, it suggests that there is an external force or agent imposing the action on the individual.
Volition
Another distinction between the two phrases is the element of volition. Being subject to something may imply a lack of choice or control over the situation. It suggests that the individual is at the mercy of external factors. On the other hand, being subjected to something often conveys a sense of imposition or coercion. It implies that the individual is being made to endure something against their will.
Examples
Here are some examples to illustrate the difference between "be subject to" and "be subjected to":
- Employees are subject to random drug tests. (implying a general vulnerability)
- The employees were subjected to a rigorous training program. (implying a forced action)
- Citizens are subject to the laws of the land. (implying a general state of being under the law)
- The protesters were subjected to police brutality. (implying a specific action imposed on them)
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both "be subject to" and "be subjected to" convey a sense of being under the influence of something, there are subtle differences in their usage. "Be subject to" is more general and passive, suggesting vulnerability or susceptibility, while "be subjected to" is more specific and active, implying imposition or coercion. Understanding these nuances can help in using the phrases correctly in different contexts.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.