Argue vs. Discuss

Attribute	Argue	Discuss
Definition	Present reasons or evidence in order to persuade someone of something	Talk about something with others in order to exchange ideas or reach a decision
Tone	Can be confrontational or adversarial	Usually more collaborative and respectful
Goal	To prove a point or persuade someone to agree with a specific viewpoint	To explore a topic, share perspectives, and potentially reach a consensus
Emotion	Often involves strong emotions and personal investment	Emotions are usually kept in check to facilitate rational discussion
Approach	More likely to involve debate, disagreement, and conflict	More likely to involve open-mindedness, listening, and consideration of different viewpoints

Definition

Argue and discuss are two common verbs used in communication, but they have distinct meanings and implications. Arguing typically involves a more confrontational approach, where individuals present opposing viewpoints with the intention of proving their own perspective as correct. On the other hand, discussing is a more collaborative and open-minded process, where individuals exchange ideas and information in a respectful manner.

Communication Style

When people argue, they often use strong language and emotions to make their point. This can lead to a heated exchange where individuals may become defensive or aggressive. In contrast, discussions are characterized by a more calm and rational tone, where participants listen to each other's viewpoints and seek common ground.

Goal

The goal of arguing is often to win or prove a point, which can create a competitive atmosphere. In contrast, discussions aim to explore ideas, gain new insights, and reach a mutual understanding. While arguing may lead to a winner and a loser, discussions strive for a win-win outcome where all parties benefit.

Approach

Arguing tends to be more focused on individual opinions and beliefs, with each person advocating for their own position. This can lead to a lack of empathy and understanding for the other person's perspective. On the other hand, discussions encourage active listening, empathy, and the consideration of multiple viewpoints to reach a consensus.

Conflict Resolution

Arguing can escalate conflicts and create tension between individuals, as it often involves a power struggle and a desire to be right. In contrast, discussions can help resolve conflicts by fostering communication, cooperation, and compromise. By engaging in discussions, individuals can find common ground and work towards a solution that benefits everyone involved.

Impact on Relationships

Arguing can strain relationships and create resentment between individuals, as it can be perceived as confrontational and aggressive. On the other hand, discussions can strengthen relationships by promoting understanding, respect, and collaboration. By engaging in discussions, individuals can build trust and empathy, leading to healthier and more positive relationships.

Decision Making

When arguing, individuals may be more focused on proving their point than on finding the best solution. This can lead to biased decision-making and a lack of consideration for alternative perspectives. In contrast, discussions encourage critical thinking, creativity, and the exploration of different options to make informed decisions that benefit everyone involved.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while arguing and discussing are both common forms of communication, they have distinct attributes and implications. Arguing tends to be more confrontational and competitive, with a focus on winning or proving a point. On the other hand, discussions are collaborative and open-minded, aiming to explore ideas, gain new insights, and reach a mutual understanding. By understanding the differences between arguing and discussing, individuals can choose the most effective communication style for different situations and foster positive relationships and outcomes.