Apt vs. CAPM

What's the Difference?

APT (Arbitrage Pricing Theory) and CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model) are both widely used models in finance to estimate the expected return on an investment. However, they differ in their approach and assumptions. CAPM assumes that the expected return of an asset is solely determined by its beta, which measures its sensitivity to market movements. On the other hand, APT takes into account multiple factors that can influence an asset's return, such as interest rates, inflation, and industry-specific variables. While CAPM is simpler to use and widely accepted, APT provides a more comprehensive and flexible framework for estimating expected returns, making it suitable for more complex investment scenarios.


Risk measurementConsiders multiple factorsConsiders only systematic risk
AssumptionsNo specific assumptionsEfficient market hypothesis, linear relationship between risk and return
FormulaApt = Risk-free rate + Beta * (Factor 1) + Beta * (Factor 2) + ...CAPM = Risk-free rate + Beta * (Market return - Risk-free rate)
FactorsConsiders multiple factors such as interest rates, inflation, market trendsConsiders only the market return
ApplicationUsed for pricing assets and portfoliosUsed for estimating expected returns of individual assets
ComplexityMore complex modelRelatively simpler model

Further Detail


When it comes to investment analysis and portfolio management, two widely used models are the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Both models aim to provide insights into the expected returns of assets, but they differ in their underlying assumptions and methodologies. In this article, we will explore the attributes of APT and CAPM, highlighting their similarities and differences.


One of the key differences between APT and CAPM lies in their assumptions. CAPM assumes that the market is perfectly efficient, meaning that all relevant information is reflected in the prices of assets. It also assumes that investors are rational and risk-averse, seeking to maximize their utility. On the other hand, APT assumes that multiple factors influence asset returns, and these factors are not necessarily related to the market. It does not require the market to be perfectly efficient and allows for the presence of arbitrage opportunities.

Factor Analysis

Both APT and CAPM employ factor analysis to determine the expected returns of assets. However, they differ in the number and nature of factors considered. CAPM focuses on a single factor, the market risk, which is represented by the beta coefficient. It assumes that the market risk is the primary driver of asset returns. On the other hand, APT considers multiple factors that can influence asset returns, such as interest rates, inflation, industry-specific factors, and macroeconomic variables. APT allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the factors affecting asset prices.

Calculation of Expected Returns

Another distinction between APT and CAPM lies in the calculation of expected returns. CAPM uses a simple linear equation to estimate the expected return of an asset. It multiplies the risk-free rate by the asset's beta coefficient and adds the market risk premium. This approach assumes a linear relationship between the asset's risk and expected return. APT, on the other hand, employs a multi-factor model to estimate expected returns. It assigns weights to each factor based on their impact on the asset's returns and calculates the expected return as a sum of the factor sensitivities multiplied by their respective risk premiums.


Both APT and CAPM have their own areas of applicability. CAPM is widely used in the finance industry due to its simplicity and ease of implementation. It provides a useful framework for estimating the expected returns of assets in a well-diversified portfolio. However, CAPM's reliance on the assumption of a single market factor may limit its accuracy in certain situations where other factors play a significant role. APT, on the other hand, is more flexible and can accommodate a broader range of factors. It is particularly useful when analyzing assets in specific industries or regions where unique factors may influence returns.


While both APT and CAPM offer valuable insights, they also have their limitations. CAPM's assumption of a perfectly efficient market may not hold in reality, as markets can be influenced by various inefficiencies and behavioral biases. Additionally, CAPM's reliance on historical data for estimating beta coefficients may not accurately capture future market conditions. APT, although more flexible, requires the identification and estimation of relevant factors, which can be challenging and subjective. It also assumes that the relationship between factors and asset returns is linear, which may not always be the case.


In conclusion, APT and CAPM are two popular models used in investment analysis and portfolio management. While they share similarities in their use of factor analysis and estimation of expected returns, they differ in their assumptions, number of factors considered, and calculation methodologies. CAPM is simpler and widely used, assuming a single market factor, while APT allows for a more comprehensive analysis of multiple factors. Both models have their own strengths and limitations, and their applicability depends on the specific context and objectives of the analysis. Understanding the attributes of APT and CAPM can help investors make more informed decisions and better assess the expected returns of their investment portfolios.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.