vs.

APS-C Sensor vs. Micro Four Thirds Sensor

What's the Difference?

APS-C sensors are larger than Micro Four Thirds sensors, which generally results in better image quality and low-light performance. However, Micro Four Thirds sensors are more compact and lightweight, making them ideal for travel and street photography. APS-C sensors also tend to have a wider range of lenses available, while Micro Four Thirds sensors have a smaller selection but are often more affordable. Ultimately, the choice between the two sensor sizes depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

Comparison

AttributeAPS-C SensorMicro Four Thirds Sensor
Sensor Size23.6 x 15.6 mm17.3 x 13 mm
Aspect Ratio3:24:3
Number of PixelsVaries by modelVaries by model
Low Light PerformanceGenerally betterGenerally not as good
Lens CompatibilityWide range of lenses availableSmaller selection of lenses

Further Detail

Introduction

When it comes to choosing a camera, one of the key decisions to make is the type of sensor it has. Two popular options in the market are APS-C sensors and Micro Four Thirds sensors. Both have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, and understanding the differences between them can help you make an informed decision based on your photography needs.

Sensor Size

The most noticeable difference between APS-C sensors and Micro Four Thirds sensors is their size. APS-C sensors are larger than Micro Four Thirds sensors, measuring approximately 23.6mm x 15.7mm compared to 17.3mm x 13mm for Micro Four Thirds sensors. The larger size of APS-C sensors allows them to capture more light, resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions.

Image Quality

Due to their larger size, APS-C sensors generally produce images with higher resolution and better dynamic range compared to Micro Four Thirds sensors. This means that images taken with APS-C cameras tend to have more detail and better color accuracy. However, Micro Four Thirds sensors are no slouch either, and advancements in technology have made them capable of producing high-quality images that rival those from APS-C sensors.

Depth of Field

One of the advantages of APS-C sensors is their ability to achieve a shallower depth of field compared to Micro Four Thirds sensors. This is due to the larger sensor size, which allows for more control over the background blur in images. If you enjoy shooting portraits or macro photography where a shallow depth of field is desired, an APS-C sensor may be the better choice for you.

Size and Weight

One of the main reasons why photographers choose Micro Four Thirds cameras is their compact size and lightweight design. The smaller sensor size allows for smaller camera bodies and lenses, making them ideal for travel and street photography where portability is key. On the other hand, APS-C cameras tend to be larger and heavier, which may be a consideration if you prefer a more substantial camera body.

Lens Selection

When it comes to lens selection, APS-C cameras have a wider range of options available compared to Micro Four Thirds cameras. This is because APS-C sensors are more commonly used in DSLR cameras, which have been around longer and have a larger selection of lenses from various manufacturers. However, Micro Four Thirds cameras have a growing selection of lenses from both Panasonic and Olympus, including high-quality prime and zoom lenses to suit different photography styles.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus performance is another important factor to consider when choosing between APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras. Both types of sensors have made significant advancements in autofocus technology, with many models offering fast and accurate autofocus systems. However, APS-C cameras tend to have an edge when it comes to tracking moving subjects, making them a better choice for sports and wildlife photography where quick and precise autofocus is crucial.

Video Capabilities

For videographers, both APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras offer excellent video capabilities, including 4K recording and advanced video features. Micro Four Thirds cameras are known for their superior video stabilization, making them a popular choice for handheld shooting. On the other hand, APS-C cameras often have larger sensors, which can result in better low-light performance and shallower depth of field in videos.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both APS-C sensors and Micro Four Thirds sensors have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and preferences. APS-C sensors are known for their superior image quality and depth of field control, while Micro Four Thirds sensors excel in size and weight, making them ideal for travel and street photography. Whichever sensor you choose, both APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras offer excellent performance and versatility for photographers of all levels.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.