Appoint vs. Hire

Attribute	Appoint	Hire
Definition	To assign a job or role to someone	To employ someone for a job
Formality	Can be formal or informal	Usually formal
Authority	Usually done by a higher authority	Done by the employer or hiring manager
Duration	Can be temporary or permanent	Usually permanent
Process	May involve a selection process	Usually involves interviews and evaluations

Definition

Appoint and hire are two terms commonly used in the context of employment. When someone is appointed to a position, it means they have been selected or chosen for that role. On the other hand, hiring refers to the process of employing someone for a specific job or task. While both terms involve bringing someone on board for a particular role, there are some key differences between the two.

Process

When it comes to the process of appointing someone, it often involves a more formal selection process. This may include interviews, assessments, and evaluations to determine the best candidate for the position. Appointments are typically made by higher-level officials or executives within an organization. Hiring, on the other hand, can be a more informal process, especially for entry-level or lower-level positions. Hiring may involve posting a job opening, reviewing resumes, and conducting interviews, but the process is often less structured than appointing someone to a higher-level position.

Authority

One key difference between appointing and hiring someone is the level of authority involved in the decision-making process. Appointing someone to a position is often done by individuals with higher levels of authority within an organization, such as CEOs, board members, or department heads. These individuals have the power to appoint someone to a specific role based on their qualifications and experience. Hiring, on the other hand, may involve multiple levels of authority, including HR managers, department heads, and supervisors. The decision to hire someone is often made collaboratively, with input from various stakeholders within the organization.

Duration

Another difference between appointing and hiring someone is the duration of the commitment. When someone is appointed to a position, it is often seen as a more long-term commitment. Appointments are typically made for higher-level positions within an organization, and the expectation is that the individual will hold that position for an extended period of time. Hiring, on the other hand, can be more temporary in nature. Employees may be hired for specific projects, seasonal work, or on a temporary basis, with the understanding that their employment may be short-term.

Responsibilities

When it comes to the responsibilities associated with being appointed versus being hired, there are some key differences. Individuals who are appointed to a position often have more authority and decision-making power within an organization. They may be responsible for setting strategic direction, making key decisions, and leading teams or departments. Those who are hired, on the other hand, may have more specific job responsibilities and tasks to complete. While they may still have a level of autonomy in their role, they are typically more focused on carrying out specific duties rather than setting overall direction for the organization.

Benefits

Both appointing and hiring someone can have benefits for an organization. When someone is appointed to a position, it can bring stability and continuity to the organization. Appointments are often made based on a candidate's experience, qualifications, and fit with the organization's culture, which can lead to long-term success. Hiring, on the other hand, can bring fresh perspectives and new ideas to an organization. By bringing in new employees with different backgrounds and experiences, organizations can benefit from increased innovation and creativity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while appointing and hiring someone both involve bringing individuals on board for specific roles, there are some key differences between the two. Appointing someone is often a more formal process that involves higher levels of authority and a longer-term commitment. Hiring, on the other hand, can be a more informal process that involves multiple levels of authority and may be more temporary in nature. Both appointing and hiring can have benefits for an organization, depending on the specific needs and goals of the organization.